Tony Greenstein | 04 March 2016 | Post Views:

Bahar was an active member of the Komala, a Kurdish political group that pushed for agrarian reform, workers’ and women’s rights and the importance of diminishing the clout of tribal chieftains. In the aftermath of the uprising, she was arrested by the Revolutionary Guards for one year due to her political involvement. She has lost track of how many of her friends and acquaintances were executed. (Photo: Airin Bahmani)

There is a
widespread belief that because Iran is or was in conflict with the United
States and because of the hostility of Netanyahu and the Israeli state, it is
therefore a progressive state.  The
article below on the brutal repression of the Iranian Kurds shows that the
Iranian state is one of the most repressive in the world.

The Iranian
state itself, with the use of the Basij, the
paramilitary wing of the Revolutionary Guards, and the penetration of its
agents into every level of society best resembles both the Stalinist use of the
secret police, for example the Stasi and Hitler’s use of Nazi party spies and
watchers at every level of society.

Iran is currently executing something like
1,000 people a year, dwarfing even Saudi Arabia and second only to China.  Its method of execution, which is hanging
from cranes, is more akin to slow strangulation and therefore particularly
Sanandaj is the main stage of the young Shiite regime’s massive counterinsurgency against progressive Kurdish aspirations. (Photo: Airin Bahmani)
The West, which now sees large profits
beckoning with the end of sanctions, is quite willing to avert its eyes from
the repression of the regime because the West’s conflict with Iran was never
about human rights (although it was a useful pretext).  Trade always oils human rights abuses and
Iran is no exception.  There are
differences between Saudi Arabia and Iran, not least in the vigorous civil
society in the latter, which is more testament to the populace and the legacy
of secularism rather than the brutal rule of the Islamic clerics.  Likewise women are in a stronger position in
Iran compared to Saudi Arabia.

Although of course anti-imperialists will
always support Iran against Israel, which is the main arm of imperialism in the
Middle East, this should not mean that we support the Islamic state of Iran
when it comes to the Kurds or its own people.

Tony Greenstein

Iran’s Kurdish Leftists Share Experience of Post-Revolution State Repression

Friday, 26
February 2016 00:00 By Bruno Jäntti and
Airin Bahmani,
Truthout | News Analysis
Daughters of Mariam were involved in Kurdish leftist politics before, during and after the ousting of the Shah. Two of the daughters were arrested and tortured. One was executed. (Photo: Airin Bahmani)

A view of the city of Sanandaj, the center of Kurdish life in Iran, marks
the end of a hectic, eight-hour-long bus trip. The shuttle zigzags higher up,
affording a rugged view of one of Iran’s northwestern mountain ranges and a
stunning valley where Sanandaj is located.

At the city border, there is a checkpoint operated by the Revolutionary
Guards. This is the first contact with state officials during the more than
500-kilometer journey from the Iranian capital of Tehran to the unofficial
Kurdish capital. Iranian authorities inspect and keep record of all vehicles to
and from Sanandaj. After armed officials of the Revolutionary Guards have
searched our shuttle, we are permitted to continue to the city.

Sanandaj is the main stage of the young Shiite regime’s massive counterinsurgency against progressive Kurdish aspirations. (Photo: Airin Bahmani)

High walls rise in Sanandaj, extend for many kilometers and enclose vast
areas, forming a number of closed zones within the city. “State officials,
including personnel of the enormous security apparatus, have their own shops,
schools, hospitals, swimming pools and gyms. They have small cities inside
Sanandaj,” according to Bahar, an Iranian Kurdish woman in her 50s who has
been deeply involved in Kurdish left-wing politics before, during and after the
Iranian revolution. “Government employees live a well-off, sheltered life
behind their walls and fences.”

In Iran, the Revolutionary Guards, institutionally separated from the
military, preserve the country’s politico-religious system of
government. Following the Iranian Constitution, the Revolutionary Guards
enforce the Shiite norms of the Islamic Republic. Basij, the paramilitary
subdivision of the Revolutionary Guards, serves as a national intelligence
network and imposes adherence to the state’s moral code.

Kurdish men in Sanandaj. Iran is exceptionally diverse ethnically, religiously and linguistically. According to human rights groups, the Islamist leadership continues to discriminate against many of the country’s minorities. (Photo: Airin Bahmani)

The Iranian government recruits citizens to Basij from nearly all spheres of
Iranian society. According to a conservative estimate, the number of Iranians
who belong to the Basij system is in the millions. During peacetime, Basij’s duties include
gathering intelligence on the political views of private citizens and
communities and providing that information to the relevant state organs.
Among Iranian left-leaning dissidents and organizers, Basij is known for
apprehending and subduing critical political activists. Bahar describes Basij
as the eyes and ears of the government. “The efficacy of the institution
is based on its gigantic size as it aggressively operates and recruits in
comprehensive schools, associations and institutions – both government and
privately owned – and at university level.

“Anyone can be a Basiji. It is not a rare occurrence that a Basiji hides his or her state affiliations from family and relatives,” Bahar said.

Kurdish men in Sanandaj. Iran is exceptionally diverse ethnically, religiously and linguistically. According to human rights groups, the Islamist leadership continues to discriminate against many of the country’s minorities. (Photo: Airin Bahmani)

The perks and benefits that Basij collaboration entails are considerable and
enticing to many citizens who might otherwise not harbor deep-seated sympathies
or loyalties to the Shiite leadership.

The perks include monetary bonuses, housing benefits and
food stamps. Senior high school students joining Basij may be rewarded with
scholarships to prestigious universities. It is likely that US-driven sanctions against
Iran used to make these carrots ever more tempting. In a survey conducted in Tehran, 55.4 percent of Basij
members were working class and 43.4 percent were lower middle class.
Furthermore, official Iranian sources confirm that 62 percent of Iranians regard the
multiple benefits offered by the state to Basij members to be the primary
motive behind citizens’ interest to join the organization.

Roja’s son was executed by the state as part of the suppression of the uprising. (Photo: Airin Bahmani)

Quelling the Progressive Iranian Kurdish Uprising

The atmosphere of suspiciousness and cautiousness instigated by Basij has a
decades-long history, not least in the Kurdish areas of the country. For
Ayatollah Khomeini’s Islamist cadre, which had just spearheaded a revolution,
arguably the gravest and most immediate domestic challenge emerged from
northwestern Iran in the form of a progressive, democratic and pluralistic
Kurdish grassroots uprising.

During and after the Iranian revolution, the most powerful Kurdish political
groupings were the Democratic Party of Iranian Kurdistan (KDPI) and the Komala.
The KDPI advocated for a center-left platform and sought to secure Kurdish
autonomy from Khomeini. Already in April 1979, the KDPI presented the government an elaborate deal in which Tehran
would take the lead in matters of defense, foreign relations and long-term
economic planning. In return, the central government would allow the
establishment of an autonomous Kurdistan with its own parliament, which would
exercise far-reaching legislative powers. In the KDPI’s proposal, Kurdish was
to be recognized as an official language along with Persian.

Partly in agreement with the KDPI’s autonomy model, the Komala
platform revolved around an emphasis on agrarian reform, workers’
and women’s rights and the importance of diminishing the clout of tribal
chieftains. Initially a Marxist and feminist underground established in the
late 1960s, the Komala gained immense popularity among Iranian Kurds soon after
the revolution. The Komala enjoyed vast support among the country’s Kurdish
population and had its most prominent strongholds in Sanandaj, Marivan and
Baneh – all significant Kurdish cities in close proximity to one another.

“Fostering democratic process with a strong emphasis on a feminist and
pluralistic platform was among the primary aims of our insurrection,”
Bahar said.

Although a solid majority of Iranian Kurds had supported the revolution, no
consensus was reached between any Kurdish organizations and Khomeini on the
future status of Iranian Kurdistan. Soon, fighting erupted between government
forces and Kurdish fighters. The ensuing confrontation between the Shiite
triumphalists and Kurdish political movements was to be a showcase not only for
the Revolutionary Guards and its paramilitary Basij, but for the entire
Islamist enterprise.

Of the numerous Iranian Kurdish cities, Sanandaj swiftly emerged not only as
the center of left-oriented Kurdish popular uprising, but the main stage of the
armed conflict. Exuding confidence in its ability to comprehensively
reconfigure the post-Shah Iranian state at a rapid pace, the Shiite elite
launched a full-scale counterinsurgency. Kurdish cities became targets of a heavy bombing campaign as the Islamists fired shells
from state installations within those cities. Tehran also deployed its air
force against the Kurdish rebellion.

Ultimately, incursion by the Revolutionary Guards and Basij paramilitaries
into Iran’s Kurdish cities, particularly Sanandaj, proved an epoch-making event
in the counterinsurgency. The Revolutionary Guards quickly smashed the armed
wing of the revolt. State forces began searching houses one by one, hunting
down the architects of the insurgency.

After resorting to a large-scale program of torture, interrogation and
blackmail, the Iranian authorities managed to chart the structure and plans of
the rebellion. Between 1979 and 1982, the Iranian government killed approximately 10,000 Kurds – a considerable
portion in mass executions.Lasting Emotional and Physical Trauma

Every single eyewitness interviewee of ours, including Bahar, recollects how
the state delivered death sentences in the style of an assembly line. A
preponderance of the death sentences was issued by the judge Ayatollah Sadiq
Khalkhali, who earned the nickname the “Hanging Judge.” Our
interviewees stressed the personal role of Khalkhali in subduing the uprising.

When Khalkhali died in 2003, his legacy was praised in the Iranian
Parliament. Speaker of the Parliament Mehdi Karoubi paid tribute, in particular, to Khalkhali’s performance in
the early phases of the revolution.

“We were all waiting for our turn,” Bahar said. “Participants
in the uprising were being arbitrarily executed. State forces inflicted the
most cold-blooded torture techniques on us, making sure that those of us who
they preferred alive did not die.

Bahar was released after a year in custody. Most of her family members were
either summarily executed or managed to flee the country.

“Later, we got back the body of our cousin Reza, a member of the
Bahar said. “His torso was full of burns, contusions and
bruises. A large emblem of Iran, the crescent and a sword, was burned to his
rib cage. Reza was far from the only member of my family who was tortured to

Later, the Revolutionary Guards destroyed Reza’s grave, alongside the graves
of all other known political activists and prisoners. It was inconceivable for
the authorities to allow any indication of a political status of those buried
in the main cemetery in Sanandaj. Furthermore, they did not tolerate the
gravestones to be inscribed with the names of the deceased if they had any
affiliations with the uprising.

After the early phases of the uprising, the authorities stopped delivering
the bodies of Kurdish activists back to their families. “All we have left
of Reza is his memory and a location he was buried in,”
Bahar said.

It is not just through the experiences of her family members and friends
that Bahar is familiar with the details of the state’s counterinsurgency
campaign. In 1983, she was arrested by the Revolutionary Guards.

“We were taken to an interrogation room one by one. When it was my
turn, they blindfolded me and brought me into the room. There were a number of
interrogators and officers present. They forced me to lie down on my stomach
and tied me to a metal bed. I was bombarded with questions on my political
activities, my motives, my comrades and their whereabouts. My answers did not
appeal to the interrogators. They began lashing the soles of my feet with power
cables. This happened continuously, day after day, until I was unable to walk.
If I wanted to move, I had to crawl. The interrogators brought me a wheelchair.
Then the foot whipping continued.”

In its crackdown on the uprising, the Iranian government routinely resorted
to lethal torture as well as torture that caused permanent damage. “The
pain inflicted on many of us was so severe that it will stay with us for the
rest of our lives. Presently, in 2015, I can still feel it every single day.
Bastinado [foot whipping] led to neuralgia. According to a doctor, nerve
pathways in my feet have been damaged and will never heal.”

Bahar shared in great detail how she and all of her comrades gave it their
all, as she put it, “to finally emancipate [Iran] from the yoke of
authoritarianism … [which the nation] had witnessed since the ousting of
Mohammed Mossadegh in 1953.”

The organizers of the uprising will carry with them the defeat they suffered
for the rest of their lives. “We longed for a social and political change
and were ready to risk everything to attain it,”
Bahar said.
Notwithstanding our best efforts, we did not succeed. What we were left
with is lasting emotional and physical trauma.”

Roja, an 84-year-old woman of Kurdish descent whose nine children all
participated in the uprising as members of the Komala, digs up a photo album of
her son who was executed in Sanandaj in 1982. It is prohibited to engage in any
commemoration of those killed in the suppression of the uprising, hence
documents such as photos must be hidden. As routine practice, Revolutionary
Guards deploy officers to put an end to all forms of organized commemoration.

Looking at photos of her son, Roja commented on the political trajectory of
Iran after the Shah. Roja, who has lived under the rule of Reza Shah, Mohammed
Mossadegh, Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and now the Islamists, observed that
never in her lifetime “has there been such a long period marked by a lack
of momentum in Kurdish popular-based progressive politics as after the quelling
of the uprising in the early 1980s. The state reached its goal of completely
annihilating Kurdish leftism.”

That every single one of our 24 interviewees can list countless people from
their circle of acquaintances who were either executed or severely tortured
suggests the scope and brutality of Tehran’s counterinsurgency.

A most salient conclusion to be drawn from our interviews with organizers of
and participants in the uprising is that the Shiite republic ultimately
succeeded in completing something in which even the Shah and his secret police,
the Savak, had failed: obliterating the socialist and progressive political
momentum among the Iranian Kurds.

Copyright, Truthout. 

Airin Bahmani

Airin Bahmani is an Iranian Kurdish political commentator specializing in
the domestic and foreign policies of Iran. She is regularly featured in the
Finnish media as a pundit on Islamophobia, Kurdish politics, feminism and the
Islamic State. She majors in Middle Eastern studies at the University of

Bruno Jäntti

Bruno Jäntti is an investigative journalist specializing in international
affairs. He is a contributor to Al Jazeera, Le Monde Diplomatique and a number
of Finnish newspapers and magazines. He focuses on Middle Eastern political
processes and has worked extensively in the region, including Northern and
Southern Kurdistan.

Related Stories

By Richard D. Wolff, Peace and Democracy Party | Press
By Alexander Kolokotronis, New Politics | Report
By Bruno Jäntti, SpeakOut | Op-Ed 

Posted in

Tony Greenstein

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.