Jewish Communities throughout the world boycotted Nazi Ger many – only the Zionists traded with them |
right-wing bodies in this country, the Tories are intending to introduce
regulations which prevent them from boycotting Israeli goods or firms that
operate in Israel or the Occupied Territories.
The Tories Opposed the Boycott of Apartheid South Africa and supported ‘constructive engagement’ with Apartheid |
Matthew Hancock – Tory Scumbag Who Supports Israel’s Occupation and Repression in Palestine |
this is quite logical or consistent.
Whereas 99% of Jewry in the 1930’s supported an economic and cultural boycott
of Nazi Germany, the Zionists negotiated a trade agreement, Ha’avara, with the Nazis
which resulted in 60% of capital investment in the Jewish economy in Palestine between
1933 and 1939 coming from Nazi Germany! [David Rosenthall, Jewish Frontier, Vol.
LXV, No. 3 (632) MAY/JUNE 1998] Israel literally owes its foundation to Hitler.
Even the bourgeois Jewish Chronicle condemned Ha’avara as an ‘unclean thing’.
The Sodastream Shop in Brighton Succumbed to the Boycott – We were helped in our campaign by local Zionist campaigners who created more disruption than us! |
the oppressed – from the boycott of slave grown sugar in the West Indies to the
Boycott of Nazi Germany and the boycott of Apartheid in South Africa.
the oppressed have been opposed by the Conservatives in their time. It is no wonder that they oppose a boycott of
Israeli goods today alongside their Zionist friends.
The Response of the Jewish Community in the 1930’s was to Boycott Nazi Germany – only the Zionists and the Jewish bourgeoisie objected |
regulations as they are in breach of international law and provide aid and
succour some of the world’s foulest and most repressive regimes, Israel and Saudia Arabia included.
The first known Boycott was the boycott of slave-grown sugar – naturally the Tories opposed this too as the plantation owners were Tories! The Zionists weren’t yet in existence |
Yesterday South Africa, today Israel |
The Jewish Chronicle advocating the Cultural Boycott – in the 1930’s! Under Editor Stephen Pollard, the JC opposes all anti-racist boycotts |
US actors call for the boycott of Nazi Germany-1938 |
See also A History of the Boycott – The Weapon of the Oppressed
plans to prevent procurement campaigns that conflict with national policy –
such as those against Israel and UK arms companies.
Jewish Chronicle article on the world famous conductor of the Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra, Dr Furtwangler and Einstein’s comments on his role |
There was a time when the Jewish Chronicle supported a Boycott against racist states |
Councils and local authorities are to be blocked from boycotting Israeli
products or pursuing other foreign policy goals that conflict with the
government.
Massive Jewish Boycott Meeting in Madison Square Gardens, New York |
Conservative aides said the measure was a response to growing concern about
the “militant actions of leftwing councils” that they claimed was spurred on by
the Labour
leadership.
The Jewish Chronicle condemned the Zionist collaborators for making a trade agreement with the Nazis when everyone else was boycotting them – it called Haa’vara an ‘unclean thing’ |
The Successful Boycott of Sodastream in Brighton, Sussex |
The Jewish Chronicle’s attitude to the Boycott of Sodastream was the same as that of the Daily Mail towards the Boycott of Nazi Germany |
The new rules will stop politically motivated boycott and divestment
campaigns by town halls against UK defence companies and against Israel.
Even the Women’s Shopping League supported the Boycott of Nazi Germany |
The Cabinet Office minister, Matthew Hancock, said the action was intended
to prevent “playground politics” from councils.
The Boycott of Slave Grown Sugar |
Even in Latvia there was a large Boycott campaign |
The government will amend pension legislation to make clear that using
pensions and procurement policies to pursue boycotts, divestments and sanctions
campaigns against other countries and the UK defence industry are
inappropriate, unless they are in line with action on a national level.