Backs Down as Zionist Lobby Continues to Attack him
below by Asa Winstanley makes it clear that the draft Labour manifesto was
altered as a result of pressure from the Labour Friends of Israel, which is nothing more than a front for the Israeli Labour Party, and the Jewish Labour Movement, an extension of the Israeli Labour Party inside our Labour Party.

and illegal’ was taken out at the last minute. Likewise a statement
that ‘that Labour “cannot accept the continued humanitarian crisis in the
Occupied Palestinian Territories” was also removed.
![]() |
| The equation of Israel’s continuous military violence with Palestinian attempts to fight back is an example of how far Corbyn has capitulated to Watson and co |
Africa would also have been ‘unbalanced’ as far as the White Supremacists were
concerned. How can you be neutral between
an occupier and the occupied? The idea of ‘equivalence’ between an occupier and an occupied people, who are subject to the full force of military repression is obscene.
a military and settler colonial occupation of the West Bank. 3 million Palestinians have no civil or
political rights. They are governed by
an entirely different set of laws and regulations to Jewish settlers, Military
Law as opposed to Israel’s civil law, is usually known as Apartheid. When one takes into account that Israel’s Palestinians
are also treated as a guest population, segregated and the subject of violence
and discrimination, in Israel on sufferance, then the removal of even the
reference to the continued humanitarian crisis, especially in Gaza is a
disgrace.
30+ years in the Palestine solidarity movement.
His capitulation to the Zionist lobby is sad. The same lobby which, in the case of the Jewish
Labour Movement voted 92-4% to support Owen Smith last summer. The Chair of the JLM Jeremy Newmark has made
it clear that in the event of him being elected, fortunately very unlikely, he
would not support Jeremy Corbyn alongside a number of right-wingers such as
Hove’s Peter Kyle and John Woodcock.
![]() |
| The Zionists would have Labour be even handed between a military occupation and the rights of those who live under occupation |
there is no Palestine solidarity group inside the Labour Party to counter the Israeli
Embassy’s groups – Labour Friends of Israel and Jewish Labour Movement.
Greenstein
over Labour manifesto changes
has been queued for review by site administrators and will be published after
approval.
Watch 17 May 2017
Party)
intervention from the Israel lobby.
a general election on 8 June.
Palestinian West Bank” being “wrong and illegal” was removed from the final document.
humanitarian crisis in the Occupied Palestinian Territories” was also removed.
the changes were made after Jeremy Newmark, chair of pro-Israel group the Jewish Labour Movement, complained about the
draft being an “unbalanced, partisan” text.
Gaza, its “occupation and settlements” and an “end to [Palestinian] rocket and
terror attacks.” By doing so, it created a false equation between the violence
of Israel, a highly militarized state, and the resistance tactics used by some
Palestinian groups in response to Israeli oppression.
also made more explicit in the final version.
recognition at the UN.” The final version commits the party to “immediately
recognize the state of Palestine” if it wins the election.
the party, has described the changes as a “difficult win,”
according to The Jewish Chronicle.
and has a history of working closely with the Israeli government
against the Palestine solidarity movement.
seat in Parliament.
been essentially reverted to the pledges Labour made before the 2015 general
election. The two wordings are almost identical, apart from the references to
Palestinian “terror attacks” and the “state of Palestine.”
conflict and all sides must avoid taking action that would make peace harder to
achieve.”
opinion polls, its ratings have been surging after unvealing a
series of policy proposals.
slightly increasing tax for those with an annual salary exceeding
£80,000 ($104,000) were once polical consensus, carried out by Labour and
Conservative governments alike.
and later under Tony Blair’s New Labour, that current leader Jeremy Corbyn’s modest social democratic program
can be portrayed by a hostile media as a dangerous and
“radical” document which would take the UK “back to the 1970s.”
long-failed conventional “wisdom.”
its human rights violations against Palestinians. Even the draft version
contained no such proposal.
constrained by the Labour Party’s right-wing, pro-Israel remnants.


