The BBC’s coverage of Israel’s violence in Jerusalem
didn’t meet with its approval. The
shooting of Palestinians took precedence over the killing of settlers. So the Israeli state didn’t just complain,
like you and me, it demanded that the headline on the story be changed.
PSC picket in Brighton of the Biased Broadcasting Corporation
And so ‘a
harshly-worded letter’ was sent to Richard Palmer, head of the BBC’s bureau in Israel. Like any good police state, sorry ‘the only
democracy in the Middle East’ warning that ‘it could face sanctions for running
a news headline highlighting the death of the Palestinian terrorist shot by
police’. In Israel it is a normal
democratic practice for the government to place sanctions on those whose
coverage is deemed unacceptable. Naturally the BBC jumped to obey.
BBC – the Voice of Israel
Nitzan Hen, head of the Government Press Office, told Palmer that the BBC’s
efforts were “far from satisfactory.”
The headline was changed at least three times, but each time to a phrase
that ‘did not accurately reflect the events’.
The Press Office considered, in the best democratic manner, ‘annulling the
press cards of BBC journalists, a decision that if implemented would not allow
the network to continue operating in Israel.’
Now if this was Iran…
However all’s well that ends well, for Israel that is. ‘The network, which has a long history of
alleged anti-Israel bias… apologized and revised the headline to read, “Two
Israelis killed in stabbing attack; Palestinian suspect shot dead.”
And now you see just how the BBC, that robust defender of press freedom
behaves in practice. Now if this was
Mugabe’s Zimbabwe….
Note how in the crazy Zionist world of Israel the BBC ‘has a long history of
alleged anti-Israel bias’. News to some
of us, that’s for sure.
Al-Jazeera’s reporting sparks outrage on social media;
neither network describes Saturday killings as terrorism
The Government Press Office on Sunday warned the BBC it could face sanctions
for running a news headline highlighting the death of the Palestinian terrorist
shot by police Saturday after
fatally stabbing two Israelis, rather than the attack itself.
For some reason people defend the BBC against the Tories proposals when it’s really an internal squabble amongst the British Establishment
A harshly-worded letter was sent to Richard Palmer, the head of the BBC bureau in Israel, by the head of the GPO after the British network initially published a headline that read “Palestinian shot dead after Jerusalem attack kills two.”
PSC Brighton picket of BBC during Gaza attacks
The headline, which referred to the two Israeli victims in a passive voice and neglected to mention that the Palestinian casualty — Muhannad Halabi, 19 — was shot by police at the scene of the deadly attack, was widely condemned in Israel.
The BBC later amended the headline but the head of the GPO Nitzan Hen told Palmer in the letter that the BBC’s efforts were “far from satisfactory.”
The BBC changes its headline to one acceptable to Israel
Hen charged that the BBC coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was “unethical” and could serve to incite more violence against Israelis.
Officials in both the GPO and the Israeli Embassy in London asked the network to change the headline and it was changed at least three times, but each time to a phrase that did not accurately reflect the events of Saturday’s attack, the Hebrew language NRG website reported.
The network, which has a long history of alleged anti-Israel bias, claimed in its defense that the headline in question was written by a junior editor and was not the result of an anti-Israel agenda.
The BBC issued an official response Sunday saying the network “identified that the headline didn’t accurately reflect the events, nor the details reported in our online story, so changed it of our own accord.”
According to a GPO official, Israel expects an official apology from the network, and said the office was considering annulling the press cards of BBC journalists, a decision that if implemented would not allow the network to continue operating in Israel.
Officials in both the GPO and the Israeli Embassy in London asked the network to change the headline and it was changed at least three times, but each time to a phrase that did not accurately reflect the events of Saturday’s attack, the Hebrew language NRG website reported.
PSC picket in Brighton
The network, which has a long history of alleged anti-Israel bias, claimed in its defense that the headline in question was written by a junior editor and was not the result of an anti-Israel agenda.
Following the outcry, the network apologized and revised the headline to read, “Two Israelis killed in stabbing attack; Palestinian suspect shot dead.”
An al-Jazeera editor on Sunday wrote that the network “regretted” the wording of its headline and tweet of the attack, saying it appeared “to minimize the killings of the Israeli victims and leaves out the context that the Palestinian man was their attacker.”
The editor said al-Jazeera was alerted to the post after “many people in our audience pointed out” its problematic nature. It said the post was written “under the pressure of breaking news.”
The news agency called the criticism by its viewers “valid” and said the story was updated with the amended headline.
In their reports, neither al-Jazeera nor the BBC referred to the deadly stabbing attack as terrorism.
On Saturday evening, Rabbi Nehemia Lavi and IDF soldier Aharon Banita were stabbed to death in Jerusalem’s Old City by Halabi. Banita’s wife was also stabbed and was taken to hospital in serious condition. The Banitas’ two-year-old was lightly wounded in the attack.
Police announced Sunday it would limit Palestinian access to Jerusalem’s Old City and the Temple Mount compound over the next two days.
