Miller Has Abandoned Anti-Zionism in Favour of Conspiracy Theories About Jewish Infiltrators
Rise of the Jewish Empire with Prof. David Miller
Introduction
David Miller has nearly 100k followers on X. To many he is a hero because of his battle against dismissal from Bristol University and his subsequent victory at an Employment Tribunal. However there is another side to Miller.
Miller has begun propagating conspiracy theories about Zionism taking over the world and engaging in ‘state capture’. No longer is Zionism the adopted policy of western states, which support Israel because, in the words of Reagan’s Secretary of State Alexander Haig, it is an ‘unsinkable aircraft carrier’ situated in a strategically important, energy rich region.
Zionism is instead a monster that is engaged in a project involving the take-over and control of the world powers, including its former imperialist sponsors. Indeed it is on its way to having gained control of all of them.
Not surprisingly it is attracting support from fascists, racists, anti-Semites, conspiracy theorists and other assorted fruitcakes and loony tunes. Zionism according to Miller is really no different from the Elders in the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion who planned and plotted to take over the world and subvert the existing order. Miller is one in a long line of cranks.
Why is this important? Because it is already poisoning the Palestinian narrative. No longer is Israel the attack dog of the United States, no longer is it performing important tasks for imperialism, the ‘dirty work’ as Chancellor Merz described Israel’s attack on Iran. Israel is now the major imperialist power and Britain and the United States are its colonies.
Fortunately Miller’s fantasies are fringe rhetoric but that doesn’t mean they cannot do damage. Miller believes the Western states have been captured and need to be ‘freed’. Instead of being institutionally racist and imperialist they are essentially good institutions concerned with their people.
The Zionists have taken the British and American states over for their own evil purposes and subverted them. Solidarity work is all but useless. What we need is to root out the Zionist infiltrators who for all practical purposes are Jewish.
I don’t think I need to point out where this is going but it is a dark place which explains nothing and in the end leaves us defenceless against attacks from our own states. Islamophobia is a Zionist import. Fascists like Tommy Robinson and Geert Wilders are not homegrown, a product of British and Dutch society. They are Zionist creations.
At worst it aligns us with racists and fascists and those, like Tucker Carlson and Marjorie Green, who believe US imperialism is a good thing but Israel has led it astray and is costing us too much.
It also leads us into a false battle, not against Zionism and the Israeli state but against ‘Jewish Supremacy’. In so doing it plays completely into Zionist hands, legitimises their accusations of ‘anti-Semitism’ and allows the British and American states reasons for repressing the Palestine solidarity movement. In short David Miller and his theories pose a danger to the solidarity movement.
Dismissal from Bristol University
David Miller was Professor of Sociology at Bristol University when he was dismissed in October 2021 after allegations of ‘anti-Semitism’ by Zionist students, one of whom, Sabrina Miller, infiltrated one of his lectures.
Other partners in crime included the President of the Bristol Jewish Society Nina Freedman, and her successor Edward Isaacs, both of whom became President of the Israeli Embassy funded Union of Jewish Students. In 2021 Isaacs threatened to sue me for calling him a liar. When I repeated my accusation he thought twice about it. I never heard from him again.
The whole Miller affair was co-ordinated by Zionist lobby groups such as the Community Security Trust and UJS.
Miller’s expertise was in corporate and political power networks, including the Zionist lobby. The Zionists took particular exception to his suggestion that Zionism was one of the five pillars of Islamophobia.
When Miller was being attacked by Zionists I supported him. The decision to sack him was an outrageous attack on free speech on Palestine by an institution that had been cowed and intimidated by a false ‘anti-Semitism’ smear campaign.
Over a hundred MPs and peers, many of them overt racists and Islamaphobes like Baroness Cox and Bob Blackman MP, but also including the Green Party’s Caroline Lucas, called for Miller to be dismissed. The result was that Bristol University capitulated despite him having been cleared of anti-Semitism by two QCs.
David’s victory at the Employment Tribunal in February 2024 which found that he had been wrongfully and unfairly dismissed and directly discriminated against on the grounds of religion or belief was welcome. The decision established that anti-Zionist views qualify as a protected belief under the UK Equality Act 2010.
Statement by Bristol University – They then demonstrated why they don’t regard the principle of academic freedom as fundamental
However Miller’s focus on the Zionist Lobby has resulted in him being unable to see the wood for the trees. He cannot place the power and influence of the Zionist lobby in any perspective or context. No longer is Israel the attack dog of US imperialism. Rather it is Israel which is in control of imperialism. Indeed it has become the major imperialist power!
Political Degeneration
Miller’s political regression can be traced to a tweet in August 2023 where he made 3 points:
1. Jews are not discriminated against.
2. They are over-represented in Europe, North America and Latin America in positions of cultural, economic and political power.
3. They are therefore, in a position to discriminate against actually marginalised groups.
Miller was correct to say that Jews are not discriminated against or experiencing racism. There is no state anti-Semitism in Britain or Europe. Anti-Semitism is a marginal prejudice. I could even accept his observations on Jewish ‘overrepresentation’ in positions of power, because statistically and sociologically it is undoubtedly true, though how relevant it is is debateable.
However Miller’s third point that this enabled Jews to discriminate against those who were oppressed was wrong. If Jews in powerful positions discriminate against others they do it as part of the organisations they are a part of, not as collective Jews.
Miller’s political degeneration was then rapid. On 21 September 2024 he retweeted a thread by an open Nazi, Aiden Hunter. Hunter had previously called for the “eradication” of Jewish people as a “moral and racial duty“. In the same tweet Miller copied an article by Richard Lynn, editor of Mankind Quarterly ‘On the high intelligence and cognitive achievements of Jews in Britain’.
Mankind Quarterly was established in 1960 in order to oppose to civil rights in America. It has been described as a ‘white supremacist journal’ and by the Southern Poverty Law Centre as a ‘pseudo-academic journal… a vehicle for scientific racism.’
It only takes a minute of research on the Internet to establish who Richard Lynn, Mankind Quarterly and Aiden Hunter are. It casts a shadow over the rest of Miller’s research, especially his conclusions.
When I first saw the tweet it was obvious that it smacked of the racial sciences. Why was ‘Jewish intelligence’ even a subject for discussion? Miller asked:
The Origins of Zionism
I explained that Zionism was the creation of British imperialism and Christian Zionism not Jews.
A Leader in The Times of 17 August 1840, called for a plan ‘to plant the Jewish people in the land of their fathers’ claiming that it was under ‘serious political consideration’. When Lord Palmerston approached the Board of Deputies in August 1840 to inquire about Jewish settlement projects, he got a very lukewarm response. The only ones who didn’t want to ‘return’ were the Jews themselves! In a resolution passed on 7 November 1842 the Board of Deputies resolved that it
is precluded from originating any measure for carrying out the benevolent views of Colonel Churchill respecting the Jews of Syria. [Regina Sharif, Non-Jewish Zionism – Its Roots in Western History, pp.58-63, Zed Press, 1983].
In October 1917 the leader of the Board of Deputies, Claude Montefiore admitted that:
if H.M. Govt. is anxious to publish this formula [the Balfour Declaration] for the sake of the country, as well as the Jews, I would, of course, subordinate my Jewish feelings, wishes & interests to the interests of England and the Empire.
The Conjoint Foreign Committee, which dealt with foreign affairs
‘appears to have been particularly slow to see the extent to which British Imperial interests might ultimately converge with Zionist ambitions.’
The British Jewish bourgeoisie were opposed to Zionism in the 19th and early 20th century. It wasn’t until 1939 that the Zionist Selig Brodetsky won the Presidency of the BOD.
One of the earliest supporters of the Jewish ‘return’ to Palestine was the Protestant Evangelical Lord Antony Ashley Cooper, seventh Earl of Shaftesbury. He was also anti-Semitic and opposed Jewish Emancipation in 1858. It was on Shaftesbury’s insistence that Palmerston in 1838 opened a British consulate in Jerusalem and appointed a Vice-Consul there. William Young, with the title of Protector of the Jews in Palestine.
The 1845 Frankfurt Rabbinical Conference agreed a resolution that
all petitions for the return to the land of our fathers and for the restoration of the Jewish state should be eliminated from the prayers.
The Central Conference of American Rabbis in the Pittsburgh Declaration of 1885 declared:
We consider ourselves no longer a nation but a religious community, and therefore expect neither a return to Palestine… nor the restoration of any of the laws concerning the Jewish state.’
The only member of Lloyd George’s War Cabinet to vote against the Balfour Declaration was its only Jewish member,Sir Edwin Montagu. The anti-Zionist Jewish bourgeoisie in Britain only came round to the idea of Zionism when it was clear that support for Zionism was the fixed position of British imperialism.
Jewish Supremacism
On 21 October 2024 Miller declared that ‘the State of Israel is at war with you’. That when activists or Muslims are arrested “that is being done directly on behalf of the State of Israel”
Having been arrested by the counter-terror police and facing trial imminently I don’t consider that my arrest was done on behalf of the Israeli state. I was arrested by the British state. Miller’s answer was
The challenge is to be anti-Zionist, to materially contribute to the global struggle against Jewish supremacism. Your war is right where you are.
From 2024 he was tweeting repeatedly about ‘Jewish supremacism’, going so far as to anticipate that at the impending General Election the British state would be “totally captured by genocidal Jewish supremacists.”
No longer was the fight against Zionism but Jewish Supremacism. On 14 November 2025 he tweeted in respect of an interview by Amar Kazmi with Rahmeh Aladwan that
Jewish supremacism is the kernel of Zionism but is also disturbingly common among self-professed anti-Zionist Jews, several of whom are involved in the leadership of the ‘pro-Palestine’ movement.
This helps to curb the emergence of a genuinely liberatory anti-Zionism, which would necessarily challenge Zionism in Jewish institutions.
He offered no evidence for this analysis or attack on Jewish anti-Zionists.
Miller talked about ‘the global struggle against Jewish supremacism’ not even Zionism. He not only conflated all Jewish people with the Israeli state, like the Zionists, but he implied that all Jews are Jewish Supremacists. It is difficult to see this as anything but anti-Semitic.
Israel is a Jewish Supremacist state, which even Israel’s B’tselem acknowledges but Miller’s call was not directed at Israel but at Jews everywhere.
Even accepting that up to two-thirds of diaspora Jews identify as Zionists, I doubt if any but a fraction are open Jewish supremacists. Most Jews see Israel, wrongly, as a refuge against anti-Semitism or a place where their family are. Of course a minority are Jewish supremacists and openly support the repression of Palestinians but even they are not arguing for Jewish supremacism within the societies they live in. They are also not the problem. The Israeli state and western support for it is.
If you call for a global struggle against Jewish Supremacy then you are talking about a racial, not a political struggle. You will inevitably find yourself aligned with those on the far-right who are happy to join the fight against Jewish Supremacy. In other words you are joining with those who are in full support of imperialism but wish to divert the fight to a battle against what they see as Jewish control of western nations.
In an essay Zionism, Jewish Supremacy, Imperialism in the German context Hebh Jamal writes about Jewish Supremacy as:
a supposedly independent force that controls Western governments and coerces them into acting in Israel’s interest. According to this framework, Zionism is not an expression of imperialism but a unique racial power structure, and therefore we should be willing to align with anyone, including right-wing actors, to combat it.
This argument… only makes sense if you detach Palestine from the material systems, including the military, economic and ideological structures, that sustain colonial projects. Without situating Zionism within imperialism, settler colonialism, capitalism and white supremacy, you are left with a worldview that mistakes symptoms for causes.
To be clear: Jewish supremacy is real. It is the racial logic that undergirds the creation of a Jewish ethnonational state, the apartheid legal system and the genocidal violence unleashed on Palestinians….
But Jewish supremacy in this context is a function of Zionism, not a global force directing Western empires. It is a racial logic embedded within a settler-colonial project that thrives because it is aligned with Western imperial interests, not because it controls them.
Racism & Colonialism
Miller and his followers however makes all the mistakes that Hebh Jamal outlines. He and others, not least his devotee Dr Rahmeh Aladwan, see Jewish Supremacy as an independent force in itself, rather than a consequence of Zionism’s creation of the Israeli state.
Miller argues that Islamophobia in the West is a product of Zionism and Israel. “the soldiers of Zion have penetrated the security establishment of your state to make its policy.” Miller avoided telling us how they managed to achieve this remarkable feat. Even worse, without this penetration the British state would be a benevolent and benign creature.
At a stroke Miller has erased the inherent racism of British colonialism and its assumption that conquering other peoples’ territories was a good thing, on account of their ‘backwardness’. Was Trump’s Muslim ban also a consequence of Israel? Did Trump label all Mexicans as rapists because of the soldiers of Zion? And the deportations to Latin America and the current threats to Venezuela?
It is not difficult to see how this kind of conspiracy theory of an all-powerful Zionism and an independent ‘Jewish Supremacy’ degenerates into anti-Semitism. British fascists used to condemn Israel because in their eyes it was a ‘Jewish’ state. They were devoted advocates of the British Empire but resented the Jews playing a part in it. The Palestine solidarity movement wanted nothing to do with them but Miller seems to be embracing them.
Racism in the West is home grown. Islamophobia goes hand in hand with support for Israel, a vicious anti-Muslim state. Attacks on Muslims in Britain are not being done on behalf of Israel but our own state. The same is true in the US. Miller says
Take Geert Wilders, in the Netherlands, … Wilders can be said to be a creation of the State of Israel and its foreign intelligence assets.
Wilders is not a creation of the Israeli state. He is a home-grown fascist for whom Zionism is attractive because it is seen as the ideal ethno-nationalist state. In Change Jordan’s name to Palestine Gilders said:
If Jerusalem falls into the hands of the Muslims, Athens and Rome will be next. Thus, Jerusalem is the main front protecting the West. It is not a conflict over territory but rather an ideological battle, between the mentality of the liberated West and the ideology of Islamic barbarism.
Miller therefore exonerated the West of racism by saying that their racism is not the product of their own societies but that of Israel. He therefore exonerated imperialism.
Miller’s language is sloppy and imprecise, especially for an academic. I suspect this is deliberate. Miller has abandoned anti-Zionism and anti-imperialism. Zionism is simply about Zionist fanatics and the soldiers of Zion.
When he says that the British and American states don’t do what they do because of capitalism or imperialism but because of infiltration by Zionists he is absolving imperialism from blame for Israel. The support of the West for for Zionism is on account of individuals not the architecture of the imperialist war machine. He said that
there’s no such thing as ‘foreign’ policy. The British state has made a colossal miscalculation by participating so directly in this genocide,… The British people will have to repair this trajectory by taking British political and public institutions out of the grip of Zionist fanatics. This is the only way to preserve the balance of British society in the long-term. It is essential that Britain is de-Zionised.
A de-Zionised Britain could be an example to other post-imperial states in how to confront centuries of imperial violence and chart a course away from the suicidal client relationship with the US.
Not only is Britain ‘post imperial’ but its support for Israel is because of a handful of Zionist fanatics. If it wasn’t for them the British state would be a friendly, non-racial creature.
This has nothing to do with anti-Zionism. It ignores the economic, strategic and political imperatives behind imperialism. I responded to Miller here and JVL republished it here.
An attack on the Left and Jewish anti-Zionists
In another conspiratorial tweet, on 21 October 24, Miller wrote that the ‘global left is occupied and infiltrated by Zionist fanatics.’
Miller doesn’t understand that attitudes on the left towards Israel have changed. In the wake of the holocaust most of the left saw Israel in a favourable light. They failed to see that an ethno-nationalist Jewish state would become ‘Hitler’s bastard offspring’.
The Labour left saw Zionism, Israel and settler colonialism as positive. The natives were invisible. Historically much of the left, especially the labourist, social democratic left were complicit in seeing imperialism and colonialism as having positive attributes.
Trotskyists adopted a position of neutrality during the Nakba seeing the 1948 war between Israel and the Arab armies as a conflict between British imperialism, its Arab allies and Israel. The Communist Parties under Stalin, supported UN resolution 181 and the creation of a ‘Jewish’ state.
This all changed with the invasion of Lebanon in 1982 when Tony Benn and Eric Heffer resigned from Labour Friends of Israel. In 1948 most people knew nothing of the Nakba. They didn’t see that Zionism had much in common with the Nazis ideologically and had collaborated with them. Israel’s army had been trained by the British and it easily saw off the ramshackle Arab armies with the exception of Transjordan’s Arab Legion.
With the rise in support for anti-imperialist struggles in Cuba, Vietnam and South Africa, the left reassessed its position. The PLO emerged after 1967 as an independent force as the Arab regimes were discredited. Israel was seen as an arm of US imperialism.
In the Labour Party it was the right-wing which had historically been pro-Arab. People like Christopher Mayhew, David Watkins and Andrew Faulds. After 1982 the Right realigned. Support for Zionism was virtually a condition of New Labour. Miller is simply wrong.
Miller argued that ‘A basic tenet of anti-imperialism is to begin with suspicion when confronted by possible agents of Empire.’ I hate to disappoint Miller but a basic tenet of anti-imperialism is support for the oppressed not the oppressor. And who are these agents of Empire?
In other words it is leftist ‘Jewish ‘allies’’ who are the agents of Empire. This is clearly anti-Semitic. Jews are entryists, infiltrators. Anti-Zionist Jews should be treated with suspicion. It is an open call to divide the solidarity movement between Jews and non-Jews. It is a call to racialise the solidarity movement. It assumes that Jews are inherently Zionists and as such Miller’s arguments reflect Zionist arguments. It assumes that Jews (and non-Jews) are all of one mind.
Miller fails to acknowledge that Jews might have good reasons to oppose Zionism. Zionism endangers Jews outside Israel through associating them with Israel’s ethnic cleansing and genocide. Israel seeks to control and manipulate Jewish communities into giving it blanket political support.
We only have to think of people like Moshe Machover, Ilan Pappe, Avi Shlaim and Haim Bresheeth to recognise the anti-Zionist Jewish contribution to the struggle. It was the Israeli socialist group Matzpen which first called Israel a settler colonial state.
Whilst Jewish Voice for Peace have been organising thousands of its supporters on the streets Miller has been waging war against Jewish ‘infiltrators’. Miller is doing the Zionists’ work for them. In a tweet of 24 March 2025 Miller said
Those who are interested in ending this genocide must begin by targeting those responsible near them… there are Zionists everywhere. In every town and city. Find out where they are.
Do people really think that the genocide in Gaza can be ended by outing our local Zionist activists? They may be annoying loudmouthed racists like Brighton’s very own Little Miss Hitler (Victoria Boghal) but are they really responsible for the genocide in Gaza?
Is this how imperialism operates? Would the genocide not have happened but for individual Zionists in Britain? To ask the question is to answer it. Those responsible for enabling Israel’s holocaust happen to be people like Lammy, Starmer and Cooper – all non-Jews. And since about two-thirds of Jews are Zionists hunting them down will inevitably be portrayed as Jew hunting.
But if you dismiss imperialism as an interconnected system of war, economic exploitation and political domination, then it’s easier to focus on individual Zionists whilst ignoring imperialism and the complicity of the Arab regimes. Miller fails to understand why Western capitalism supports Israel. His views on the relationship between the British state and Zionism are empirical and subjective, reduced to a handful of malevolent individuals.
Even if we hunted down every single Zionist in Britain and put them up against the wall, that would not save one Palestinian child in Gaza. Netanyahu has all but written off American Jewry which is 20 times the size of the British Zionist community in favour of the more reliable Christian Evangelicals.
Miller’s analysis is so childish that it barely warrants scrutiny. It says a lot about the political poverty of some of those who see themselves as Palestinian supporters that they cannot see that his arguments are completely crazy. Bonkers.
The idea that the West supports Israel because Zionists have crept into powerful positions barely merits a response. Are the Christian Zionists in Trump’s cabinet all infiltrators? Is Marco Rubio, US Secretary of State a Zionist infiltrator?
Why does Germany’s AfD, which is riddled with neo-Nazis and holocaust deniers, love Israel so much? Is it because of infiltrators or because far-right and neo-Nazi groups although they don’t love Jews do hate Muslims. In appearing on anti-Semitic and White Supremacist platforms like Stew Peters Miller is mixing in some very unsavoury company. But this is the logic if your common enemy is Jewish Supremacy.
In a tweet of 3 March 2025 Miller dug himself further into a hole. He wrote that ‘there are no‘Israeli’ anti-Zionists’. Presumably my friends Ronnie Barkan and Stav Sinai, who are facing trial as Palestine Actionists don’t exist? Both of them are Israeli. Miller posted that
It is doubtful whether there are more than a handful of Jewish anti-Zionists anywhere,….. After all, how many Jewish martyrs have there been in the past 140 [years] on the path to liberate Palestine from Zionism? How many Jews have engaged in military action against Zionist targets in that period?
Stav Sinai & Ronnie Barkan, two Israeli anti-Zionists who, according to Miller don’t exist, at Bristol Crown Court where they were sentenced for taking part in Palestine Action’s dismantlement of an Elbit factory
One wonders whether Miller’s strictures apply to himself! His arguments are pathetic beyond words. But what is worse that they reflect the common Zionist slogan that they represent the 99% of Jews at the very time when Jewish support for Israel is slowly breaking down.
Miller is not only going down an anti-Semitic rabbit hole but a Zionist one too. Despite being a professor, Miller is ignorant about the history of Zionism. It is often said that the higher you rise in academia the more you know about less and less. Miller is a perfect example.
Israel does not control either British or US foreign policy. Support for Israel is deemed by our own ruling class to be in their interests. The United States hasn’t backed the genocide in Gaza because Biden was senile and addicted to Zionism. Trump has followed Biden’s support, if anything outdoing him David consistently looks down the telescope from the wrong end.
Israel is a Jewish Supremacist state. The majority of world Jewry support it though there is a growing and vociferous minority, especially young Jews, who don’t. A poll in 2021 found that 25% of American Jews see Israel as an apartheid state, climbing to 38% of under 40s. Today 39% say Israel is committing genocide and 61% say they are committing war crimes.
Jews function as the moral alibi for imperialist support for Israel. That is an entirely different thing from saying they are responsible for Britain supporting Israel. Miller suffers from political autism. An inability to see that evidence of A, Jewish support for Zionism, does not lead to B, British support for Zionism. B is independent of A but B might make use of A. There is no causal link between A and B. What imperialism is happy to do is to wrap their imperialist project in the clothes of Jews and the holocaust.
The rise of the Jewish Empire
David Miller, not content with arguing that the Zionist tail wags the imperialist dog has gone one further. Its no longer a Greater Israel within the Middle East but the rise of a global Jewish empire. Miller wrote on 26 April 2025 that:
The argument that the ‘State of Israel’ exists today solely as an extension of Western imperialism is outdated. Now, Israeli state capture has taken place within the United States and most Western governments
Miller rejects the idea that support for Zionism in the USA is because of the Zionist lobby. On 15 November 2025 Miller explained how anyone who thinks the US Empire is distinct from or in charge of the Zionist project is at least 25 years behind reality. On 16 November 2025 Miller wrote that
The ‘lobby’ thesis also completely fails to account for entryism, penetration and subversion of US imperial institutions, which is an essential Zionist tactic globally and has been as long as Zionism has existed. Mearsheimer claims ‘the lobby’ tries to exert influence on the State Department and the Department of Defence.
The lobby’ in the US is a tiny part of the wider Zionist movement, which in turn is a part of a far broader, global Jewish Empire with interests stretching from Argentina to Azerbaijan to Australia.
Miller said that Mearsheimer was ignorant about Zionism and ‘hasn’t been in touch with the reality of American politics since 1945.’ The arrogance is breathtaking given that Mearsheimer is widely recognised as the world’s leading realist scholar of international relations.
Between 19 July 2023, when Miller wrote about ‘How Israeli lobbying drove Britain to adopt an anti-Palestine policy’ and November 2025 there had been a major shift.
Jewish Power
On 16 August 2024 Miller wrote that:
In many countries, not least the US and the UK, Jews occupy strategic positions in the entertainment industry, the arts, publishing, journals of opinion, the academy, the legal profession, and government. Jews are represented in Britain in numbers that are many times their proportion of the population,”
and then he concluded that it would be a wonder
if these raw data didn’t translate into outsized Jewish political power. … It is certainly legitimate to query the amplitude of this political power and whether it has been exaggerated, but it cannot be right to deny (or suppress) critical socioeconomic facts.
This is an example of Miller’s flawed methodology. He leaps from the fact that Jews in the West are relatively privileged to the conclusion that that is why Britain supports Israel. He also assumes that Jews act as one, as a collective. I accept that Jews in Britain are not victims of racism and discrimination and that anti-Semitism in Britain is marginal but to then jump to the question of an ‘outsized Jewish political power’ is something else.
On 16 November 2025 he wrote that Zionists
are groomed and radicalised from an early age, not just to support the Jewish colony in the Levant but to infiltrate their host society and to influence it in Zionist interests…. a fundamental strategy of the transnational Zionist movement and it has been since it was encoded in the Jerusalem Program in 1951 … Jews are the most advantaged Religious/minority group…. There are 276 Jewish billionaires in the world, in 2025, according to Forbes… (out of) a total of 3,028 billionaires in the world. In other words some 9.1% of the world’s billionaires are Jewish; compared to 0.2% of the global population.
This is another example of an anti-Semitic and Zionist mentality. Jews in Britain don’t ‘infiltrate their host society’ they are not aliens they are part of that society.
Now it may well be true that Jews are statistically over represented in certain sections in proportion to their numbers in society but it is quite another thing to suggest that they act collectively.
The whole concept of ‘Jewish Power’ is an updated version of historic Jewish conspiracy theories. I’m not suggesting that Miller is therefore arguing for a political program involving expulsion of Jews from western societies, although others will certainly do so. However it is noticeable how many neo-Nazis and anti-Semites are commenting favourably on his X posts.
It is an entirely legitimate to ask why Jews are represented in the numbers Miller suggests. I have no doubt that there are historical-materialist reasons. However it is the conclusions and the use to which Miller puts these which I am questioning.
Conclusion
Such is the delusional nature of his conspiracy theories that I question Miller’s sanity. It is not as if he has written anything even remotely equivalent to Mearsheimer’s The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. His theories of the new Jewish Empire are grounded in fantasy. There is no overarching framework to what is an obsession with pouring out his latest undigested thoughts on Twitter.
Whereas most of us greeted the election of Zohran Mamdani as Mayor of New York as a victory over the corrupt Democratic establishment (and Trump) Miller saw no change, writing that:
‘Zohran Mamdani is a Zionist and a servant of Zionists. If you want to keep getting mugged by shysters like him while they spit in your face and then stand on your shoulders, good luck to you.’
To see no change at all in the American political climate, or to abuse someone who has been forthright about the genocide in Gaza is truly amazing. The fact that over a third of New York Jews voted for Mamdani is itself remarkable. As JVL remarked in statement (14 November):
You have to be living on another planet not to have noticed the phenomenal achievement of Mamdani winning against all the odds: against the Democratic establishment, against the mainstream Jewish lobbying groups, against the big money which dominates US politics and countless Islamophobic slurs against him…. Miller’s writings are increasingly shrill, divisive and misleading. [See Jonathan Rosenhead’s Trusting Heroes? David
With the creation of the Jewish Empire there also comes Pax Judaica. On 12 April 2025 Miller posted that “the Zionist Empire operates by penetrating and subverting Western states, societies and economies to serve its ends.”
Miller wrote endorsing the far-right Candace Owens in respect of the release of the Epstein files: ‘The new Jewish Empire also seeks hegemony in the digital sphere’.
David Miller is the organiser of the Palestine Declassified program which is funded by the Iranian state. Miller is a staunch defender of the clerical Iranian regime. When Roshan Salih, Editor of the conservative Islamic site 5 Pillars wrote that:
Sections of the Left hold deeply Islamophobic views. This is the section that seems to support Zarah Sultana… they automatically assume Muslim men are motivated by nothing but misogyny.
Miller responded saying that
There is a lot of truth in this, and @zarahsultana‘s commitment to the sort of muscular liberalism which was produced by the War on Terror — weaponising feminism, sexuality and gender against Muslims — has done enormous damage to Your Party’s prospects to alliance-building.
This is an outrageous libel. Zarah Sultana is an anti-imperialist not a supporter of the war on terror. 5 Pillars supports the Taliban’s oppression of women in Afghanistan. There is nothing Islamophobic about opposing the repression of women by so-called Islamic regimes, be they in Iran or Afghanistan.
Miller continues on his bizarre and erratic journey to the right. I wonder when his followers will wake up to the political and intellectual bankruptcy of their idol?
Tony Greenstein
This above was first published in a shortened version in the Weekly Worker as Wood for the Trees
