The Stupidity of what’s left of the
Unemployed Centre/Case Central (!) in Hollingdean
 |
| Leaflet from those currently running what was the Unemployed Centre in Hollingdean |
For many of us on the
Left in Brighton last weekend was a focus of activity. On Saturday during the day there was a march
of 150,000 against austerity in London.
In the evening, at the Synergy Centre there was a variety of
entertainment.
On Sunday there was a
day full of debate and discussion amongst people on the Left about how we take
the battle against austerity and for change forward. (see 99% People’s Assembly Festival Ousting Austerity).
 |
| Magazine at the core of Bright Benefits Campaign |
At about 11.30 we were
also treated to a picket by Brighton Benefits Campaign/Aufheben. BBC is a small group which has
grown smaller since it was founded 6 years ago.
One of the reasons for its failure to grow, at a time when benefits have
been slashed and there have been popular movements against for example the Bedroom Tax has been
its extreme sectarianism. A number of
members who disagreed with the tiny sect, Aufheben, which controls BBC have
been forced out by the 2 leading members, Giuseppa Salamone and Felton
Shorthall.
also treated to a picket by Brighton Benefits Campaign/Aufheben. BBC is a small group which has
grown smaller since it was founded 6 years ago.
One of the reasons for its failure to grow, at a time when benefits have
been slashed and there have been popular movements against for example the Bedroom Tax has been
its extreme sectarianism. A number of
members who disagreed with the tiny sect, Aufheben, which controls BBC have
been forced out by the 2 leading members, Giuseppa Salamone and Felton
Shorthall.
 |
| Giuseppina’s flattery is at odds with Aufheben’s leaflet about a Trotskyist/Leninist dictatorship! |
I publicly disagreed
(not at a conference as their leaflet says but a skype session) with the
Aufheben line that claimants are a potentially
revolutionary class by stating that on the contrary claimants have a
politically backward consciousness, are susceptible to racism and scapegoatism
and incapable of forming their own independent organisations. Felton Shorthall expressed his disagreement with me by
shouting in my face, a party trick he has repeated with a number of other
people. Although the motion to expel me
was defeated I resigned anyway. Subsequently at least 4 people have been forced out of what was already a
tiny group hence why the annual sanctions day protest consists of the same handful of people.
(not at a conference as their leaflet says but a skype session) with the
Aufheben line that claimants are a potentially
revolutionary class by stating that on the contrary claimants have a
politically backward consciousness, are susceptible to racism and scapegoatism
and incapable of forming their own independent organisations. Felton Shorthall expressed his disagreement with me by
shouting in my face, a party trick he has repeated with a number of other
people. Although the motion to expel me
was defeated I resigned anyway. Subsequently at least 4 people have been forced out of what was already a
tiny group hence why the annual sanctions day protest consists of the same handful of people.
 |
| What helped lead to the financial crisis was the refusal to remove the fundraiser who was on permanent holiday – John Drury, a more sane member of Aufheben accepted need to dismiss her but this was blocked by Giuseppina – who now calls the worker a ‘whistleblower’ |
This year they decided
on another activity, picketing a conference on austerity. The reason?
Because the centre in which the conference was held uses people on workfare. Instead of coming into the meeting and
putting their position, they chose to picket for ½ hour before wandering off
into oblivion.
on another activity, picketing a conference on austerity. The reason?
Because the centre in which the conference was held uses people on workfare. Instead of coming into the meeting and
putting their position, they chose to picket for ½ hour before wandering off
into oblivion.
 |
| Giuseppina first fell out with welfare rights worker Shanti and welfare rights volunteer Sue Graham and…. |
The question of
workfare was discussed at the last but one section on trades unions, led by
Andy Richards, Chairperson of the local UNISON Local Government branch. As a founder of Brighton Unemployed Centre I
made the point that the Synergy Centre was not Poundland or some capitalist
exploiter, where people are maximising the profits of a corporation and
stacking shelves. Although we disagree
with workfare, because it uses claimants who would otherwise be sanctioned if
they didn’t agree to work, the key question was whether those who were so employed at Synergy were indeed voluntary. We
needed an assurance that those who were on the scheme at Synergy were there
voluntarily and further that if they didn’t wish to work at Synergy they would
be returned to the contractor without being in jeopardy of being
sanctioned. We were assured by those
who run the Synergy Centre, which is a non-profit making collective and indeed
those who work there, without exception, that they want to be there as opposed to being forced
to be there. Further that they should
not be out of pocket. With the exception
of one person who was a member of BABC, all the other contributors agreed with
the position that I put.
workfare was discussed at the last but one section on trades unions, led by
Andy Richards, Chairperson of the local UNISON Local Government branch. As a founder of Brighton Unemployed Centre I
made the point that the Synergy Centre was not Poundland or some capitalist
exploiter, where people are maximising the profits of a corporation and
stacking shelves. Although we disagree
with workfare, because it uses claimants who would otherwise be sanctioned if
they didn’t agree to work, the key question was whether those who were so employed at Synergy were indeed voluntary. We
needed an assurance that those who were on the scheme at Synergy were there
voluntarily and further that if they didn’t wish to work at Synergy they would
be returned to the contractor without being in jeopardy of being
sanctioned. We were assured by those
who run the Synergy Centre, which is a non-profit making collective and indeed
those who work there, without exception, that they want to be there as opposed to being forced
to be there. Further that they should
not be out of pocket. With the exception
of one person who was a member of BABC, all the other contributors agreed with
the position that I put.
 |
| In her paranoia Giuseppina, who is now running Centre, accuses former worker Sharon Halsall of theft |
 |
| It was first ‘lies, lies, lies’ that we offered Pina & co. the lease and the company BUC Ltd, then it was a factoid and ‘bad memory’ – after we had shown a journalist the email we had sent – strange that! |
The political direction
of BABC consists of members of a weird, anarcho/stalinist group, Aufheben. Their main claim to fame is what is known as
the Aufhebengate affair involving Dr John Drury a lecturer at
Sussex University, who is a social science researcher on crowd control issues,
which inevitably touches on the question of policing. I have a lot of sympathy for John but I’ve
never been party to this debate.
Aufheben members took over the running of the Unemployed Centre in
Hollingdean after I was forced to resign as a full-time trustee because of
falling ill with Hepatitis C and liver disease.
Despite being extremely ill and expecting to die, I was put under
extreme pressure, bullied and on one occasion nearly attacked by Shorthall but for the intervention of another management committee member. I was expected to agree to the liquidation of a fund
that was known as the Building Fund.
of BABC consists of members of a weird, anarcho/stalinist group, Aufheben. Their main claim to fame is what is known as
the Aufhebengate affair involving Dr John Drury a lecturer at
Sussex University, who is a social science researcher on crowd control issues,
which inevitably touches on the question of policing. I have a lot of sympathy for John but I’ve
never been party to this debate.
Aufheben members took over the running of the Unemployed Centre in
Hollingdean after I was forced to resign as a full-time trustee because of
falling ill with Hepatitis C and liver disease.
Despite being extremely ill and expecting to die, I was put under
extreme pressure, bullied and on one occasion nearly attacked by Shorthall but for the intervention of another management committee member. I was expected to agree to the liquidation of a fund
that was known as the Building Fund.
I have written a comprehensive article in Brighton & Hove Independent explaining the background of the
crisis. Essentially the 2 Centre
charities, which had £70,000 in funds when I left, rapidly ran out of money because of a combination of financial maladministration by Giusepina Salamone, thefts of money and toys coupled with
the inability of the fundraiser, Aufheben supporter, Robbie Bryan, to
raise any money. Salamone and friends expected
that a Building Fund fund agreed on throughout the Centre’s existence by the volunteers, by the Trades Council and unions as well as
trustees of the Centre, would be used for running costs instead. When the trustees of the Fund refused to agree
to this and insisted that the Building Fund was for buying a new building we
were subject to virulent abuse.
crisis. Essentially the 2 Centre
charities, which had £70,000 in funds when I left, rapidly ran out of money because of a combination of financial maladministration by Giusepina Salamone, thefts of money and toys coupled with
the inability of the fundraiser, Aufheben supporter, Robbie Bryan, to
raise any money. Salamone and friends expected
that a Building Fund fund agreed on throughout the Centre’s existence by the volunteers, by the Trades Council and unions as well as
trustees of the Centre, would be used for running costs instead. When the trustees of the Fund refused to agree
to this and insisted that the Building Fund was for buying a new building we
were subject to virulent abuse.
 |
| Salamone criticised me for clamping down on the thefts she tolerated! |
 |
| Excluding ‘external’ bodies i.e trade unions from management of Centre – same happened at BUC Families Project |
The Building Fund was
constituted into a formal legal trust with 5 trustees in early 2014 in order to
ensure that the money within it, approximately £1/2m would be legally protected
from Aufheben’s supporters and to maximise returns and preserve the value of
the capital. Subsequently a small
additional trust, The Trust for Unpopular Causes, has been set up in order to
provide grant aid to campaigning groups in the community.
constituted into a formal legal trust with 5 trustees in early 2014 in order to
ensure that the money within it, approximately £1/2m would be legally protected
from Aufheben’s supporters and to maximise returns and preserve the value of
the capital. Subsequently a small
additional trust, The Trust for Unpopular Causes, has been set up in order to
provide grant aid to campaigning groups in the community.
 |
| Document obtained by Local Government Ombudsman showed New Labour Council acted, with Charity Commission, to remove Tony Greenstein & political trustees – the same clearly happened with Giuseppina and Felton |
The split in the
Unemployed Centre has been between those who believe unemployment is a
political issue and those who believe it is a charitable issue. In many ways this mirrors a similar dispute
at Brighton Unemployed Centre Families Project in 1996/7. It was out of that dispute that the
Hollingdean Centre was formed. At BUC
Families Project, the local Council in the form of New Labour’s Steve Bassam secretly
planned to remove the political elements at the unemployed centre who had been
involved in things like the poll tax campaign and impose those who saw
unemployment as a solely charitable issue.
This information only came to light later via a complaint to the Local
Government Ombudsman. Indeed many of the
allegations, that we refused to hand over money for the Centre’s political wing
to the charitable wing, have reoccurred too.
Unemployed Centre has been between those who believe unemployment is a
political issue and those who believe it is a charitable issue. In many ways this mirrors a similar dispute
at Brighton Unemployed Centre Families Project in 1996/7. It was out of that dispute that the
Hollingdean Centre was formed. At BUC
Families Project, the local Council in the form of New Labour’s Steve Bassam secretly
planned to remove the political elements at the unemployed centre who had been
involved in things like the poll tax campaign and impose those who saw
unemployment as a solely charitable issue.
This information only came to light later via a complaint to the Local
Government Ombudsman. Indeed many of the
allegations, that we refused to hand over money for the Centre’s political wing
to the charitable wing, have reoccurred too.
 |
| ‘I suspect Shanti’ well we all did but the story has changed now! |
From 1999-2012 the
Centre was in the forefront of political campaigning and we don’t mean by this
the desultory pickets of BBC. When we first opened the Centre we were met with open hostility by the 3 New Labour councillors led by the wife of the then Labour MP for Pavilion, Jeane Lepper. As Chair of the Planning Committee she worked to deny us planning permission. For 13 years none of the councillors set foot in the centre. As soon as I resigned as trustee Lepper was buttering up Giuseppina & co.
Centre was in the forefront of political campaigning and we don’t mean by this
the desultory pickets of BBC. When we first opened the Centre we were met with open hostility by the 3 New Labour councillors led by the wife of the then Labour MP for Pavilion, Jeane Lepper. As Chair of the Planning Committee she worked to deny us planning permission. For 13 years none of the councillors set foot in the centre. As soon as I resigned as trustee Lepper was buttering up Giuseppina & co.
 |
| Jeane Lepper did her best to deny us planning permission at the Centre |
 |
| How touching – New Labour’s Lepper supporting the new anarchist centre in Hollingdean |
Almost soon as the Centre began in Hollingdean, the refuse workers occupied the Hollingdean depot to enable
the removal of the private contractor SITA.
They won and the Centre’s volunteers were integrally involved in
picketting and we moved our computer equipment into the site so that the
workers could produce propaganda. We
likewise provided support for the campaign against a directly elected Mayor in
2003 and later, when a Labour Council tried to transfer all council housings to
a private company (an ALMO) we helped fund the Brighton Housing campaign set up
to defeat the Council in a referendum.
In this we were successful.
Labour was defeated in both referendum by about 65-35.
the removal of the private contractor SITA.
They won and the Centre’s volunteers were integrally involved in
picketting and we moved our computer equipment into the site so that the
workers could produce propaganda. We
likewise provided support for the campaign against a directly elected Mayor in
2003 and later, when a Labour Council tried to transfer all council housings to
a private company (an ALMO) we helped fund the Brighton Housing campaign set up
to defeat the Council in a referendum.
In this we were successful.
Labour was defeated in both referendum by about 65-35.
 |
| There surely must be some mistake?!! Brighton unwaged is Giuseppina Salamone! |
Today what is left of
the unemployed centre is incapable of supporting anything because it is
controlled by a freak political group with no roots or base anywhere.
the unemployed centre is incapable of supporting anything because it is
controlled by a freak political group with no roots or base anywhere.
 |
| Robbie Bryan justifying why the Charity Commission allows a nakedly racist and apartheid organisation, the JNF to register as a charity |
Ironically our great communists,
Felton Shorthall and Giuseppina Salamone, have sought the aid of the Charity
Commission and the Police. Unfortunately
for them the Charity Commission has refrained from a repeat of its failed
intervention 20 years ago when it froze the funds of Brighton Unemployed Centre
Ltd until we brought legal pressure to bear.
The Charity Commission’s main role is to police left-wing charities and
harass Muslim charities. It is led by
arch right-winger and former Director of the cold-war Henry Jackson Society
William Shawcross. The CC presides over
and defends the activities of Zionist charities like the Jewish National Fund
which provides funds for land in Israel which is for the exclusive use of
Jewish settlers.
Felton Shorthall and Giuseppina Salamone, have sought the aid of the Charity
Commission and the Police. Unfortunately
for them the Charity Commission has refrained from a repeat of its failed
intervention 20 years ago when it froze the funds of Brighton Unemployed Centre
Ltd until we brought legal pressure to bear.
The Charity Commission’s main role is to police left-wing charities and
harass Muslim charities. It is led by
arch right-winger and former Director of the cold-war Henry Jackson Society
William Shawcross. The CC presides over
and defends the activities of Zionist charities like the Jewish National Fund
which provides funds for land in Israel which is for the exclusive use of
Jewish settlers.
 |
| happier days |
They justify this by saying
I reported someone who had siphoned thousands of pounds from the One Fund For
All fund that the TUC had helped set up into his personal bank account. I did indeed make a complaint to the Police. But inviting the Police into what is a
political dispute is entirely different.
The money has not been stolen but it has been put beyond the reach of
Aufheben. It is also the case that a
local woman who had painted a penis on my car was reported, not by me, to the
Police. What she was doing was marking
me out as a paedophile (I had refused to let her use my computer!) and that was
a threat to my physical safety.
I reported someone who had siphoned thousands of pounds from the One Fund For
All fund that the TUC had helped set up into his personal bank account. I did indeed make a complaint to the Police. But inviting the Police into what is a
political dispute is entirely different.
The money has not been stolen but it has been put beyond the reach of
Aufheben. It is also the case that a
local woman who had painted a penis on my car was reported, not by me, to the
Police. What she was doing was marking
me out as a paedophile (I had refused to let her use my computer!) and that was
a threat to my physical safety.
 |
| The trials and tribulations of those who deal with the State – Police and Charity Commission – of course when no crime has been committed it’s all a bit difficult
|
Their justification for
trying to involve the Charity Commission is that I once referred another
charity, the Deans Youth Project to the CC.
This is true, but what they omit to say that it was in the context of a
whistleblowing case where a worker, Carolyn Simmons, had been framed by her
employer and dismissed on a bogus charge of overpaying herself, i.e. theft
because she had reported fraud and corruption in the charity. Her employers even made a complaint to the
Police, who also ignored it. When I took
the case to an Employment tribunal we won a 3 day hearing of unfair dismissal
because of a Protected Disclosure (whistleblowing) and obtained substantial
compensation. Of course I reported this
charity to the Charity Commission because it had victimised a worker who had
tried to expose corruption. It had
nothing to do with asking a government body to intervene in a political
dispute. 3 Tory councillors were our witnesses, not just Mary Mears as Aufheben
allege! The respondents also had a Tory
Councillor, Dee Simson who sacked the claimants and gave false evidence.
trying to involve the Charity Commission is that I once referred another
charity, the Deans Youth Project to the CC.
This is true, but what they omit to say that it was in the context of a
whistleblowing case where a worker, Carolyn Simmons, had been framed by her
employer and dismissed on a bogus charge of overpaying herself, i.e. theft
because she had reported fraud and corruption in the charity. Her employers even made a complaint to the
Police, who also ignored it. When I took
the case to an Employment tribunal we won a 3 day hearing of unfair dismissal
because of a Protected Disclosure (whistleblowing) and obtained substantial
compensation. Of course I reported this
charity to the Charity Commission because it had victimised a worker who had
tried to expose corruption. It had
nothing to do with asking a government body to intervene in a political
dispute. 3 Tory councillors were our witnesses, not just Mary Mears as Aufheben
allege! The respondents also had a Tory
Councillor, Dee Simson who sacked the claimants and gave false evidence.
 |
| Letter calling Tony Greenstein 4 interview re malicious complaint from Giuseppina & friends – Robbie Bryabn even repeats the same lies below! |
 |
| ‘Poisonous’ Pip Tindall and Robbie Bryan justifying grassing me up to social security – Bryan considers himself an expert on my disability! |
What the Aufheben
leaflet doesn’t mention is that in early March I received an ‘invitation’ to
attend an interview with the DWP. I
assumed it was a routine interview but when I attended I was informed that a
malicious and anonymous complaint had been made against me. It was clear from what I was told that the
complaint could only have come from those at the Unemployed Centre and Aufheben
who ran the Centre. I was asked if I was
a director Brighton Unemployed Centre Ltd and I was happy to accept that I
was. It is a non-trading company limited
without guarantee. I receive no
remuneration for being a director. There
was also an allegation I was not disabled, but that would be news to my two
consultants. On the website of the
Unemployed Centre’s third charity, Case Central, there is an allegation to this
effect from Robbie Bryan, which confirms that he or those around him were
responsible for making the complaint.
Making malicious complaints or grassing people up demonstrates the total
lack of any political integrity or ethics of those involved in what is left of
the old Centre.
leaflet doesn’t mention is that in early March I received an ‘invitation’ to
attend an interview with the DWP. I
assumed it was a routine interview but when I attended I was informed that a
malicious and anonymous complaint had been made against me. It was clear from what I was told that the
complaint could only have come from those at the Unemployed Centre and Aufheben
who ran the Centre. I was asked if I was
a director Brighton Unemployed Centre Ltd and I was happy to accept that I
was. It is a non-trading company limited
without guarantee. I receive no
remuneration for being a director. There
was also an allegation I was not disabled, but that would be news to my two
consultants. On the website of the
Unemployed Centre’s third charity, Case Central, there is an allegation to this
effect from Robbie Bryan, which confirms that he or those around him were
responsible for making the complaint.
Making malicious complaints or grassing people up demonstrates the total
lack of any political integrity or ethics of those involved in what is left of
the old Centre.
 |
| First Giuseppina suspected one person and then another |
A short detour into
the politics of Aufheben. They are an
eclectic mixture of anarchist and Stalinist politics. I once asked Giuseppina why she and Felton
never went on anti-fascist mobilisations in Brighton and she told me that she described
herself as a follower of the founder of the Italian Communist Party Amadeo Bordiga that
fascism was just another variant of capitalism and shouldn’t be opposed
separately. This probably explains
Bordiga’s essay “Auschwitz, or the Great Alibi” which is the nearest to a left justification of the Holocaust. It isn’t anti-Semitism but the ejection of
the Jews from the productive process which explains Auschwitz and
Treblinka. As Mitchell Abidor says in
the introduction to the essay, ‘Der Sturmer” meant nothing. Kristallnacht meant
nothing. All we had was capitalism looking for a way out of a crisis.’ It was economic reductionism taken to absurdity. Bordiga alleged that the SS ‘believed
in Western ideals!’
the politics of Aufheben. They are an
eclectic mixture of anarchist and Stalinist politics. I once asked Giuseppina why she and Felton
never went on anti-fascist mobilisations in Brighton and she told me that she described
herself as a follower of the founder of the Italian Communist Party Amadeo Bordiga that
fascism was just another variant of capitalism and shouldn’t be opposed
separately. This probably explains
Bordiga’s essay “Auschwitz, or the Great Alibi” which is the nearest to a left justification of the Holocaust. It isn’t anti-Semitism but the ejection of
the Jews from the productive process which explains Auschwitz and
Treblinka. As Mitchell Abidor says in
the introduction to the essay, ‘Der Sturmer” meant nothing. Kristallnacht meant
nothing. All we had was capitalism looking for a way out of a crisis.’ It was economic reductionism taken to absurdity. Bordiga alleged that the SS ‘believed
in Western ideals!’
 |
| Unfortunately there was nothing to investigate
|
Having been one of the founders of the unemployed centre in
1981, I bridled at the lies and caricatures that Salamone & Shorthall used
to justify their turning what was a democratically run radical centre into a
personal fiefdom. Black people and
migrants say that there is a racist atmosphere now in the place from white volunteers. Felton Shorthall was recently banned from the
Hollingdean Food Project for attacking a vulnerable woman refugee. The woman concerned was (wrongly) suspected of having informed me about the disaster of a refugee outing at Lulworth Cove. The children’s outings have been exploited to
provide the funds to run the centre and there were complaints about how a
refugee outing was run last October.
1981, I bridled at the lies and caricatures that Salamone & Shorthall used
to justify their turning what was a democratically run radical centre into a
personal fiefdom. Black people and
migrants say that there is a racist atmosphere now in the place from white volunteers. Felton Shorthall was recently banned from the
Hollingdean Food Project for attacking a vulnerable woman refugee. The woman concerned was (wrongly) suspected of having informed me about the disaster of a refugee outing at Lulworth Cove. The children’s outings have been exploited to
provide the funds to run the centre and there were complaints about how a
refugee outing was run last October.
 |
| Text that described the refugee outing in Dorset – most of the funds for which had been diverted to Centre running costs |
 |
| Robbie Bryan – ‘I am not one of these anarchist squatters who is happy living on a sofa, I am actually a proud bloke who wants to pay his way in life’ – how touching |
An utterly dishonest leaflet ‘A Leninist Nightmare’ which makes out that Aufheben is an anarchist
group was produced. It attacks the
Socialist Party, despite Giuseppina having previously tried and failed to win its members’
support. If it were true that a
Trotskyist dictatorship at the Centre had been established in the past 15 years
one wonders why Giuseppina had never complained of this before. As the images here of the graphics here show,
she was singing an entirely different tune in emails to me!
group was produced. It attacks the
Socialist Party, despite Giuseppina having previously tried and failed to win its members’
support. If it were true that a
Trotskyist dictatorship at the Centre had been established in the past 15 years
one wonders why Giuseppina had never complained of this before. As the images here of the graphics here show,
she was singing an entirely different tune in emails to me!
 |
| Robbie Bryan refers ‘hippy anarchists who will sit about all day pretending to be poor and intimidating real poor and vulnerable people’ |
Despite making sympathetic noises to anarchists about
Leninists and Trotskyists, despite their attachment to Bordiga, the unguarded
comments of Robbie Bryan show what the real view of anarchists is. One of contempt. Robbie Bryan refers to a new unemployed
centre, which the Building Fund was established to purchase as likely to ‘attract lifestyle hippy anarchists who will
sit about all day pretending to be poor and intimidating real poor and
vulnerable people.’ Elsewhere Bryan
informed me that he wasn’t ‘one of these
anarchist squatters who is happy living on a sofa. I am actually a proud bloke who wants to pay
his way in life’!!
Leninists and Trotskyists, despite their attachment to Bordiga, the unguarded
comments of Robbie Bryan show what the real view of anarchists is. One of contempt. Robbie Bryan refers to a new unemployed
centre, which the Building Fund was established to purchase as likely to ‘attract lifestyle hippy anarchists who will
sit about all day pretending to be poor and intimidating real poor and
vulnerable people.’ Elsewhere Bryan
informed me that he wasn’t ‘one of these
anarchist squatters who is happy living on a sofa. I am actually a proud bloke who wants to pay
his way in life’!!
 |
|
The Brighton & Hove Unwaged Advice & Rights Centre charity was used to fund BBC
|
It seems that Aufheben
or Case Central as they now call themselves have nothing better to do with
their time than picketing a day of debate and discussion about things like
austerity and unemployment.
or Case Central as they now call themselves have nothing better to do with
their time than picketing a day of debate and discussion about things like
austerity and unemployment.
Tony Greenstein
Posted in Blog
