Apologists for the Israeli state
always refer to the fact that Arabs have the vote in Israel, as if putting your cross on the ballot paper once
every 4 years rectifies all the racist injustices of the previous years. In fact nearly 50% of Israeli Palestinians
don’t even vote because it is considered a waste of time. But those who do vote overwhelmingly for Arab
parties (& the Communist Hadash) not under one electoral roof – the Joint
List.
always refer to the fact that Arabs have the vote in Israel, as if putting your cross on the ballot paper once
every 4 years rectifies all the racist injustices of the previous years. In fact nearly 50% of Israeli Palestinians
don’t even vote because it is considered a waste of time. But those who do vote overwhelmingly for Arab
parties (& the Communist Hadash) not under one electoral roof – the Joint
List.
The reason the Arab parties
and Hadash joined together for the first time ever was because the electoral
threshhold was raised from 2% to 3 .25% in order to exclude Arab parties from
the Knesset altogether. That was the
brainwave of the fascist former Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman. That forced all the non-Zionist parties to
come together.
and Hadash joined together for the first time ever was because the electoral
threshhold was raised from 2% to 3 .25% in order to exclude Arab parties from
the Knesset altogether. That was the
brainwave of the fascist former Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman. That forced all the non-Zionist parties to
come together.
Now the Knesset has decided
to support a Bill that will allow the Jewish majority to expel or suspend Arab
MKs. In an ethnocracy, where different
communities vote for either Jewish or Arab parties, then this means quite
simply that the Jewish parties are deciding which Arab representatives will be
allowed.
to support a Bill that will allow the Jewish majority to expel or suspend Arab
MKs. In an ethnocracy, where different
communities vote for either Jewish or Arab parties, then this means quite
simply that the Jewish parties are deciding which Arab representatives will be
allowed.
Democratic? In Israeli terms yes, by most peoples’
standards no.
standards no.
An
article by Marzouq El-Halabi in +972 follows the one from Times of Israel
article by Marzouq El-Halabi in +972 follows the one from Times of Israel
 |
| MKs Basel Ghattas, Haneen Zoabi and Jamal Zakalka, from the Joint Arab List’s Balad faction, visited the families of Palestinians killed while trying to stab Israeli soldiers. The MKs were trying to negotiate the returns of their corpses to the families. For this the Knesset ethics committee decided they should be suspended. Photo by Noam Moskowitz. |
Proposal
would allow lawmakers to ban colleagues for inciting racism, supporting terror;
critics say move limits democracy
would allow lawmakers to ban colleagues for inciting racism, supporting terror;
critics say move limits democracy
By
Raoul Wootliff, Times of Israel
Raoul Wootliff, Times of Israel
March 28, 2016
The
Knesset voted on Monday night [March 28] to advance a controversial law
enabling MKs to suspend their colleagues, approving the first reading of the
bill by 59 to 52 votes.
Knesset voted on Monday night [March 28] to advance a controversial law
enabling MKs to suspend their colleagues, approving the first reading of the
bill by 59 to 52 votes.
The
proposal would allow 90 MKs to vote to suspend lawmakers if they “negate the
existence of the State of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state,” incite
racism, or express support for a terror group or state in its war against
Israel.
proposal would allow 90 MKs to vote to suspend lawmakers if they “negate the
existence of the State of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state,” incite
racism, or express support for a terror group or state in its war against
Israel.
The
coalition managed to secure the win despite two Likud members refusing to
support the measure, after the opposition Yisrael Beitenu party abstained from
the vote.
coalition managed to secure the win despite two Likud members refusing to
support the measure, after the opposition Yisrael Beitenu party abstained from
the vote.
The
measure must still pass two more Knesset readings.
measure must still pass two more Knesset readings.
The
vote was preceded by a flurry of speeches by MKs calling to support or oppose
the measure, as well as discussions by some MKs about a soldier charged with
murder over the shooting death of a wounded Palestinian assailant in Hebron
last week.
vote was preceded by a flurry of speeches by MKs calling to support or oppose
the measure, as well as discussions by some MKs about a soldier charged with
murder over the shooting death of a wounded Palestinian assailant in Hebron
last week.
Speaking
before the vote, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the bill would help in
Israel’s fight against terror.
before the vote, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the bill would help in
Israel’s fight against terror.
“I
expect all those who say they are in favour of the bill to vote in support and
to not give an advantage or profit to those who support terror,” he told the
weekly Likud meeting, anticipating rebellion by a number of coalition MKs.
expect all those who say they are in favour of the bill to vote in support and
to not give an advantage or profit to those who support terror,” he told the
weekly Likud meeting, anticipating rebellion by a number of coalition MKs.
Likud
MKs David Amsalem and Avraham Neguise followed through on threats not to vote
with the government until it renews the immigration of remaining Falashmura
Jews from Ethiopia.
MKs David Amsalem and Avraham Neguise followed through on threats not to vote
with the government until it renews the immigration of remaining Falashmura
Jews from Ethiopia.
Earlier
on Monday, Avigdor Liberman, head of hawkish Yisrael Beytenu, said he would not
support the measure unless he gets tit-for-tat backing from the coalition for a
bill to block the Supreme Court from involvement in activities of the Central
Elections Committee.
on Monday, Avigdor Liberman, head of hawkish Yisrael Beytenu, said he would not
support the measure unless he gets tit-for-tat backing from the coalition for a
bill to block the Supreme Court from involvement in activities of the Central
Elections Committee.
Backed
by Netanyahu, the bill was proposed after three Arab MKs made a condolence
visit to the families of Palestinians killed while attacking Israelis, and the
three observed a moment of silence, which some said was tantamount to showing
support for terror.
by Netanyahu, the bill was proposed after three Arab MKs made a condolence
visit to the families of Palestinians killed while attacking Israelis, and the
three observed a moment of silence, which some said was tantamount to showing
support for terror.
In
a legal opinion published hours before a Monday night vote on the bill, Eyal
Yinon, the chief legal adviser for Israel’s parliament, said that while he does
not deem it necessary, it is “preferable” the proposal receive a majority and
could face legal challenges if it doesn’t.
a legal opinion published hours before a Monday night vote on the bill, Eyal
Yinon, the chief legal adviser for Israel’s parliament, said that while he does
not deem it necessary, it is “preferable” the proposal receive a majority and
could face legal challenges if it doesn’t.
“If
MKs suspected of committing crimes, they should go to the Attorney General, not misuse
parliament.” President Rivlin
MKs suspected of committing crimes, they should go to the Attorney General, not misuse
parliament.” President Rivlin
The
controversial measure has been vociferously opposed by some, including
President Reuven Rivlin, who warned that the power to punish lawmakers should
not be in the hands of fellow Knesset members.
controversial measure has been vociferously opposed by some, including
President Reuven Rivlin, who warned that the power to punish lawmakers should
not be in the hands of fellow Knesset members.
Earlier
this month Rivlin said the bill reflected “a problematic understanding of
parliamentary democracy,” and that the correct address for MKs who had
committed or were suspected of committing crimes was the attorney general, not
fellow lawmakers.
this month Rivlin said the bill reflected “a problematic understanding of
parliamentary democracy,” and that the correct address for MKs who had
committed or were suspected of committing crimes was the attorney general, not
fellow lawmakers.
Writing
on Twitter during the vote, opposition leader Isaac Herzog railed against the
proposal, saying it would do nothing to prevent terror attacks.
on Twitter during the vote, opposition leader Isaac Herzog railed against the
proposal, saying it would do nothing to prevent terror attacks.
“I
call on the prime minister and his coalition: Stop!” he wrote. “This is an
unnecessary and twisted law that is not needed in order to fight terror.”
call on the prime minister and his coalition: Stop!” he wrote. “This is an
unnecessary and twisted law that is not needed in order to fight terror.”
In
February, a stormy meeting of the Knesset’s Constitution Law and Justice
Committee voted to send the MK suspension bill for a first reading in the
Knesset — prompting the head of the Joint (Arab) List MK Ayman Odeh to announce
that he and members of his party were considering resigning from the Knesset if
the three lawmakers who made the condolence visit were expelled.
February, a stormy meeting of the Knesset’s Constitution Law and Justice
Committee voted to send the MK suspension bill for a first reading in the
Knesset — prompting the head of the Joint (Arab) List MK Ayman Odeh to announce
that he and members of his party were considering resigning from the Knesset if
the three lawmakers who made the condolence visit were expelled.
The
three lawmakers were suspended on February 8 by the Knesset Ethics Committee —
Hanin Zoabi and Basel Ghattas for four months, and Jamal Zahalka for two.
three lawmakers were suspended on February 8 by the Knesset Ethics Committee —
Hanin Zoabi and Basel Ghattas for four months, and Jamal Zahalka for two.
Odeh
also said a bill such as the one under discussion could strengthen a nascent
debate in Arab Israeli intellectual circles about creating a separate Arab
parliament in Israel, which would act as a counterweight to a Knesset that only
represented the country’s Jews.
also said a bill such as the one under discussion could strengthen a nascent
debate in Arab Israeli intellectual circles about creating a separate Arab
parliament in Israel, which would act as a counterweight to a Knesset that only
represented the country’s Jews.
Ahead
of the vote, former Shin Bet head and current Likud MK Avi Dichter said Odeh
would be called to account for his support of Palestinian terrorists
assassinated by Israeli forces.
of the vote, former Shin Bet head and current Likud MK Avi Dichter said Odeh
would be called to account for his support of Palestinian terrorists
assassinated by Israeli forces.
Odeh
later took the podium and accused Dichter of “cheap and lowly incitement” to
get headlines.
later took the podium and accused Dichter of “cheap and lowly incitement” to
get headlines.
Times
of Israel staff contributed to this report.
of Israel staff contributed to this report.
By
advancing legislation to exclude the Arab minority from the Knesset, Israel is
showing the world that its political system is really only intended for one
group.
advancing legislation to exclude the Arab minority from the Knesset, Israel is
showing the world that its political system is really only intended for one
group.
By
Marzouq El-Halabi, +972
April 08, 2016
Marzouq El-Halabi, +972
April 08, 2016
The
so-called “suspension bill,” which passed its first reading in the Knesset
several weeks ago, constitutes another step by the Israeli Right to exclude
Arab representatives from Israeli politics. The bill, which gives the Knesset
the authority to temporarily or permanently suspend elected members, stems not
from a worry over the fate of Israel’s democracy, but is part of the Right’s
slow effort to maliciously and intentionally harm it. The ultimate goal of the
bill goes unspoken, although it is clear to all: to remove the Arab electorate
from the political game in order to ensure the Right’s reign in the near
future.
so-called “suspension bill,” which passed its first reading in the Knesset
several weeks ago, constitutes another step by the Israeli Right to exclude
Arab representatives from Israeli politics. The bill, which gives the Knesset
the authority to temporarily or permanently suspend elected members, stems not
from a worry over the fate of Israel’s democracy, but is part of the Right’s
slow effort to maliciously and intentionally harm it. The ultimate goal of the
bill goes unspoken, although it is clear to all: to remove the Arab electorate
from the political game in order to ensure the Right’s reign in the near
future.
That
strategy began even before the right-wing parties marked Arabs in Israel as the
targets of a well-orchestrated delegitimization campaign. There is not a single
leader on the Right who has not tried his hand, whether through incitement,
anti-democratic bills — some of which passed — or targeting specific Arab MKs
in the Knesset. A racist public discourse that besmirches the Arab minority as
a “suspicious group” that is always “at fault.” My presumption is that this
incitement is organized, even if it comes from different political parties.
strategy began even before the right-wing parties marked Arabs in Israel as the
targets of a well-orchestrated delegitimization campaign. There is not a single
leader on the Right who has not tried his hand, whether through incitement,
anti-democratic bills — some of which passed — or targeting specific Arab MKs
in the Knesset. A racist public discourse that besmirches the Arab minority as
a “suspicious group” that is always “at fault.” My presumption is that this
incitement is organized, even if it comes from different political parties.
From
cooperation to exclusion
cooperation to exclusion
After
the Right failed, at least temporarily, to exclude the Arabs by raising the
election threshold, it attempted to put pressure on the Arab minority and its
representatives. Unfortunately, many media outlets cooperated with the Right’s
mission, even so far as strengthening the attacks against the Arab minority and
its representatives. When the atmosphere grew tense due to violent attacks by
individual Palestinians, the Right struck again, this time by outlawing the
Northern Branch of the Islamic Movement. The Islamic Movement may have been the
target, but the goal was to create an atmosphere in which the entire Arab
public is removed from the political sphere. Now it seems that the Right has
marked the representatives of the nationalist Balad party, and any other Arab
representative that does not dance to the tune of Bennett or Netanyahu.
the Right failed, at least temporarily, to exclude the Arabs by raising the
election threshold, it attempted to put pressure on the Arab minority and its
representatives. Unfortunately, many media outlets cooperated with the Right’s
mission, even so far as strengthening the attacks against the Arab minority and
its representatives. When the atmosphere grew tense due to violent attacks by
individual Palestinians, the Right struck again, this time by outlawing the
Northern Branch of the Islamic Movement. The Islamic Movement may have been the
target, but the goal was to create an atmosphere in which the entire Arab
public is removed from the political sphere. Now it seems that the Right has
marked the representatives of the nationalist Balad party, and any other Arab
representative that does not dance to the tune of Bennett or Netanyahu.
 |
| A Palestinian citizen of Israel votes in the 2015 elections, March 17, 2015 Ramle, Israel. Photo by Oren Ziv/Activestills.org |
The
process is clear. The point is to drive a wedge between the Arab minority as a
significant electorate power and the opposing right-wing camp. Let us remember
that it was the Arab members of Knesset who provided a political safety net for
Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin in the 90s. This kind of scenario could repeat
itself, which is exactly what the Right is trying to prevent by removing the
Arab minority from the political game.
process is clear. The point is to drive a wedge between the Arab minority as a
significant electorate power and the opposing right-wing camp. Let us remember
that it was the Arab members of Knesset who provided a political safety net for
Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin in the 90s. This kind of scenario could repeat
itself, which is exactly what the Right is trying to prevent by removing the
Arab minority from the political game.
The
establishment’s attitude since the founding of the state has been to include
the Arab minority in the political game, and to encourage Arab citizens to
participate in elections. Those who held this view believed that the participation
of the Palestinians who remained in their homeland would give the nascent state
a seal of approval, and would only strengthen its legitimacy in the eyes of the
world. The legal attitude was much the same: aside from the “Al-Ard ruling” in
the 1960s, Israel’s Supreme Court has tended to allow Arab parties who had been
disqualified by the Central Elections Committee from participating in
elections. The Right, which has failed at disqualifying Arab parties and
leaders, is attempting to pass legislation that would allow it to do so.
establishment’s attitude since the founding of the state has been to include
the Arab minority in the political game, and to encourage Arab citizens to
participate in elections. Those who held this view believed that the participation
of the Palestinians who remained in their homeland would give the nascent state
a seal of approval, and would only strengthen its legitimacy in the eyes of the
world. The legal attitude was much the same: aside from the “Al-Ard ruling” in
the 1960s, Israel’s Supreme Court has tended to allow Arab parties who had been
disqualified by the Central Elections Committee from participating in
elections. The Right, which has failed at disqualifying Arab parties and
leaders, is attempting to pass legislation that would allow it to do so.
And
if they succeed? What then?
if they succeed? What then?
This
move is not surprising since those behind it are right-wing ideologues who
prefer the nation and religion over the state. What is surprising is the
political camp that positions itself as an alternative to right-wing rule, the
one which praises itself for protecting democracy. Instead of fighting for
democracy and proper representative for Arabs, this camp turns a cold shoulder
to them. This camp seems to enjoy taking part in the delegitimization of the
Arab minority in Israel (see MK Avi Dichter’s speech targeting Joint List
Chairman Ayman Odeh*). This kind of discourse leaves little room for doubt that
even the “enlightened” camp, which “fights for democracy” does not intend to
include Arabs in its democracy.
move is not surprising since those behind it are right-wing ideologues who
prefer the nation and religion over the state. What is surprising is the
political camp that positions itself as an alternative to right-wing rule, the
one which praises itself for protecting democracy. Instead of fighting for
democracy and proper representative for Arabs, this camp turns a cold shoulder
to them. This camp seems to enjoy taking part in the delegitimization of the
Arab minority in Israel (see MK Avi Dichter’s speech targeting Joint List
Chairman Ayman Odeh*). This kind of discourse leaves little room for doubt that
even the “enlightened” camp, which “fights for democracy” does not intend to
include Arabs in its democracy.
Let’s
imagine that Arabs are finally excluded from the Knesset, and that the number
of Arab citizens who vote starts to dwindle — whether due to more
anti-democratic legislation or as a response to the Right’s policies. That is
precisely when the world will start to suspect that the regime in Israel is an
apartheid regime that has come out of the closet. If the political game between
the river and the sea becomes designated for one nation alone, the result will
be that the Right in Israel will have succeeded in turning Israel into an
apartheid state. There is no other name for this kind of rule. The problem is
that we are already at the peak of this process.
imagine that Arabs are finally excluded from the Knesset, and that the number
of Arab citizens who vote starts to dwindle — whether due to more
anti-democratic legislation or as a response to the Right’s policies. That is
precisely when the world will start to suspect that the regime in Israel is an
apartheid regime that has come out of the closet. If the political game between
the river and the sea becomes designated for one nation alone, the result will
be that the Right in Israel will have succeeded in turning Israel into an
apartheid state. There is no other name for this kind of rule. The problem is
that we are already at the peak of this process.
Marzouq
El-Halabi is an attorney, journalist, and author. He writes a regular column in
the London-based Al-Hayat daily newspaper.
El-Halabi is an attorney, journalist, and author. He writes a regular column in
the London-based Al-Hayat daily newspaper.
*
The link provided in the text [here]
was actually to the March 1st Haaretz report of an attack by Odeh on former
Shin Bet chief Avi Dichter. A few weeks later ‘Former Shin Bet chief MK Avi
Dichter (Likud) accused the Joint (Arab) List leader MK Ayman Odeh on Monday of
doing nothing to stop terror against Israelis.’ Times of Israel, March 29, 2016
The link provided in the text [here]
was actually to the March 1st Haaretz report of an attack by Odeh on former
Shin Bet chief Avi Dichter. A few weeks later ‘Former Shin Bet chief MK Avi
Dichter (Likud) accused the Joint (Arab) List leader MK Ayman Odeh on Monday of
doing nothing to stop terror against Israelis.’ Times of Israel, March 29, 2016
Posted in Blog
