Open Letter to Labour’s NEC – How Long will the Chakrabarti Report be Ignored?
Open Letter to Labour’s NEC – How Long will the Chakrabarti Report be Ignored?
Why, after over 19 months, has Labour’s not Implemented the Chakrabarti Report Proposals for a fair Disciplinary
I have been expelled on the basis of charges that relate solely to allegations and material that surfaced after I was suspended on March 18th 2016. In paragraph 102 of the Skeleton Argument of the Labour Party’s barrister, Thomas Ogg, be states:
102. All of the charges relate to conduct after Mr Greenstein’s suspension from theLabour Party on 18 March 2016.
In other words I was suspended first and then the Compliance Unit looked around for evidence. If that happened in a bourgeois court the charges would be thrown out for abuse of process. In the Guidelines to the National Constitutional Committee, Appendix 6 Clause 6D Procedural matters at NEC or CLP level states:
i. The rules under which the NCC operates make it clear that the NCC and its panels are concerned only with the charge(s). The procedures adopted on behalf of the Party or a CLP in advance of a referral to the NCC are not matters for the NCC dealing with a particular case. The NCC is entitled to (and will) act on the basis that the charges are properly brought before them and cannot become embroiled in dealing with complaints about the administration of any investigation leading to the charges. Any such complaint will therefore not be entertained by the NCC or panel thereof unless it is material or relevant to the consideration of the evidence to be used by the presenter in support of the charges.
This is what I have termed the ‘Turning a blind eye’ clause. Whatever the injustices perpetrated by Sam Matthews and the Compliance Unit, the NCC is obliged to ignore it except of course that in Chapter 9, Clause IX (4) the Rule Book lays down an obligation on the Labour Party to be fair:
4. The NCC or any panel thereof in hearing and determining charges against an individual shall have regard to procedural guidelines as determined by the NCC. The NCC shall have the power to supplement such guidelines from time to time and to modify its procedures in order to meet the circumstances of any particular case to ensure fairness to both the individual and the Party.
Below is a letter from members of
the Labour Party in Holborn & St Pancras and Hampstead & Kilburn asking
why, 19 months later, the Chakrabarti Report’s recommendations on a fair disciplinary
process have not been implemented.
The Chakrabarti Report has gathered dust for the past 19 months as the Labour Right cannot openly oppose its recommendations on natural justice and fair process
Brighton and Hove were suspended
solely because, having lost democratic elections to Momentum candidates, the
Right invented false allegations of spitting and intimidation. In Wallasey, after the attempted coup by 172 MPs, Angela Eagle became the challenger to Corbyn. Wallasey
CLP made it clear that they were going to back Jeremy Corbyn and the Labour Party headquarters responded by
suspending the party. The pretext was false accusations of homophobia which apparently took place at an
AGM. Now, after the dust has died down, these
allegations have been quietly dropped because of course they were always without substance.
The late and unlamented Iain McNicol and his servants
were happy to suspend whole parties for the benefit of Progress and the 172 PLP
traitors on the basis of outright lies.
We had the spectacle of the Disputes Committee investigator in Brighton,
Katherine Buckingham refusing to look at the video of the alleged spitting
incident on ‘data protection’ grounds.
The real reason was, of course, that it proved that the original
allegations of spitting at the front entrance were complete lies and that Councillors
Warren Morgan and Emma Daniels who made the original allegations were liars.
The Letter that Anne Black, recently deposed Chair of the Disputes Committee, sent to the suspended Brighton & Hove Labour Party – from the beginning Black assumed that the allegations were true, as can be seen in her final sentence
The Chakrabarti Report on Racism
and Anti-Semitism in the Labour Party has gathered dust for over 18
months. It made a comprehensive series
of recommendations, basic principles that every court of law in the country
takes for granted. However for McNicol,
the Compliance Unit and Labour’s civil service, the idea of according people
accused of offences under the Labour Party constitution the basic right of
knowing who your accusers are, what the charges are and the evidence against
you is unthinkable. These petty
bureaucrats, who would not have been out of place in Stalin’s Rusia, invent allegations against those they suspend and ‘auto
exclude’ for naked political reasons on the flimsiest of pretexts. The last thing they want are any written
procedures. Fairness doesn’t come in to
it. That is why the Chakrabarti recommendations have been comprehensively ignored.
One of the demands of Labour Against the Witch-hunt is that Chakrabarti is now implemented and we expect the now left Labour NEC to do exactly that.
Katherine Buckingham sent out the above email but her real job was to ensure that the original decision to suspend Brighton & Hove Party was vindicated
Letter to Labour’s National Executive Committee
Sisters and Brothers
We have waited for 19 months for the Chakrabarti
Enquiry’s recommendations to be put into practice, and give our party the fair
disciplinary procedures it needs and deserves.
We hope that the NEC will make a start today by clearing David Watson of
unfounded charges and letting him return to Walthamstow where he was a valued
We have seen so many good comrades across the Labour
Party suspended on the basis of anonymous accusations, and still waiting to be
reinstated. There have been waves of factional purges which are shameful in a
democratic party. First members were accused of being Green, then trade union
militants, then antisemites and then transphobic. Accusations seem to have come
down most heavily on people of colour, thus further excluding them from our
party which we say that we want to reflect the society we live in.
We are all members of the Labour Party in Holborn
& St Pancras and Hampstead & Kilburn. Many of us have Jewish
heritage. We are concerned for Labour in
future government to have a real ethical foreign policy including international
co-operation and fair trade. This includes confronting the internationally
condemned actions of the state of Israel and reining in its unfair trade
privileges, creating equal rights for Palestinian citizens and more. We
strongly deny that supporting the international nonviolent campaign of boycott,
divestment and sanctions is antisemitic, or that questioning the colonising actions
of Israel shows that the Labour Party harbours hatred of Jews. This is not our
We are still waiting for suspended active members
like David Watson to get a fair hearing and be reinstated. We need their
abilities to win the next election.
23 January 2018
(in alphabetical order)
Appleton, Highgate branch, GC delegate from Unite
Burton, Kings Cross branch
E David, Highgate branch
Davies, Kings Cross branch
Evans, Vice-Chair, Highgate branch
Firmin, CWU delegate, Hampstead & Kilburn CLP
Gisagara, BAME officer, Camden Town with Primrose Hill branch
Gray, Camden Town with Primrose Hill branch
Holland, Bloomsbury & Kings Cross branch
Kory, Hampstead & Kilburn CLP
Kuper, Political Education & Training officer, Highgate branch
Lynam, West Hampstead
& Fortune Green branch, GC delegate GMB
Miller, Gospel Oak branch
Machover, Queen’s Park branch
Muirhead, Hampstead & Kilburn CLP
Murphy, Kentish Town branch, GC delegate from Unite
Rosenbaum, Camden Town with Primrose Hill branch
Rostron, Camden Town with Primrose Hill branch
Sayle, GC delegate, Kings Cross & Bloomsbury branch
Sebestyen, GC delegate, Camden Town with Primrose Hill branch
Selwyn, Vice Chair, Camden Town with Primrose Hill branch