Executive Survives with Union Block Vote
|The Conference had around 300 delegates|
For example PSC Exec. continues to describe the Zionists’ anti-Semitism campaign as being directed at the Right to Protest. It is not, or this is not its main purpose, which is to attack politically the Palestine solidarity and anti-Zionist movement by making certain criticisms of Israel, as a Jewish state, beyond accepted bourgeois discourse. E.g. the decision of the Home Affairs Select Committee [HASC] to recommend the criminalisation of certain discourse i.e. abusive or accusatory uses of the word ‘Zionism’ seem a case in point. The equating of anti-Zionism i.e. opposition to Israel as a Jewish state with a ‘hate crime’ is not an attack on the right to protest so much as an attack on freedom of speech. PSC though seems incapable of reacting politically to political attacks on the movement.
|Jenny Tonge, who was forced to resign the Lib-Dem whip in the Lords, addressed the conference|
The HASC’s recommendation was that ‘For the purposes of criminal or disciplinary investigations, use of
the words ‘Zionist’ or ‘Zio’ in an accusatory or abusive context should be considered
inflammatory and potentially antisemitic.’ This has nothing to do with the ‘right to protest’ but is a direct political attack on those would critique Zionism. The political blinkers and caution of PSC Executive dictate that everything has to be filtered through its own political myopia.
|Lowes’ carthorse seems to be the model for Palestine Solidarity Campaign’s Executive|
PSC Conference is notoriously reluctant to censure the Executive for two main reasons – firstly the Executive can rely on ‘block votes’
from trade union affiliates who possess 3 votes in addition to a personal
vote. Secondly because activists, especially from northern branches, find it difficult and expensive to get to a
London conference starting 10 am in the morning. Most delegates therefore come from
London and the South-East. For many delegates,
attending PSC Conference is their main activity of the year.
having done virtually nothing during the year to stand up to the false anti-Semitism
campaign mounted by the Israeli Embassy and its surrogates in this country, Labour
Friends of Israel and Jewish Labour Movement.
The Zionist organisations have been invigorated by a large chunk of the
$50m dollars allocated to them by the Ministry of Strategic Affairs.
|16 year old Leanne Mohammad addresses the Conference|
Labour Friends of Israel received over £1m for freebies and trips by Labour MPs
to Israel. It does not cost
£1m to send a group of Labour MPs over to Israel and it must be assumed that
Joan Ryan MP has other plans afoot.
year. The first time they reacted was when they managed to get
a question and answer sheet together on why supporting Palestine was not anti-Semitic. That was in May 2016, a cool 5 months after the fake anti-Semitism campaign had
begun with Oxford University Labour Club.
In fact it had started much earlier when Corbyn himself was accused of associating with holocaust deniers.
Yet despite the pathetic nature of PSC Executive’s response, the crucial
motion on this was defeated by 89-112 votes.
|Haneen Zoabi, Palestinian-Israeli member of Balad in Israel’s Knesset – the subject of considerable villification including assaults by fellow Jewish Knesset members|
was lost by about 2-1 and the call for a more thorough going Review of PSC’s
multiple failures during the year by a similar margin. Although we lost the vote it was clear we won the debate. No one could answer the simple question, how can we support a 2 State solution which 2/3 Palestinians have lost faith in? How can we support a ‘solution’ that every Zionist organisation in this country purports to support? The political incoherence of PSC is staggering. It is addicted to settlements to the exclusion of everything else.
The same old stale argument that it is up to the Palestinians to decide what solution they want was trotted out. In fact the motion didn’t call for a 1 State solution but it did call for the explicit abandonment of a 2 State Solution. Today only the Quisling Palestine Authority, which is a sub-contractor to the Israeli state, supports 2 states. The reason why we should be quite clear is that people ask us what we would like to see. If PSC Executive have their way we will answer that we don’t know or have no answer or tell people to ask the nearest Palestinian they can find.
votes but was not elected. No doubt to
the relief of the current Executive who wish to continue a life of indolence and inactivity for another year. However there were a
couple of people elected who did seem good, in particular Jenny from Halifax
Friends of Palestine. However PSC this
year has demonstrated all its political and organisational failures in its inability
to make any impression at all on the Zionist offensive.
PSC is in the hands of what might be called the political remnants of the old International Marxist Group – in particular Socialist Action, a group which operates beneath the political radar and another group Communist League, which again publishes nothing. I have no problem with people belonging to either organisation but when their political perspectives affect the direction of PSC and lead to the organisation become hopelessly ineffective then it is a matter of concern.
PSC has some excellent branches, one of which – Brighton and Hove – I belong to. But the national organisation is less than the sum of its parts. The Executive is out of touch and for the most part inactive. The new Director Ben Jamal does show signs of trying to get the organisation to overthrow its old political habits and I wish him success but I am pessimistic that he will manage to achieve this.
programmes ‘The Lobby’ on the dirty tricks of the Zionist groups, PSC even
managed to fluff its response to that. PSC put up a petition calling for an inquiry on its web site. I told Ben to put it on either change.org or the Parliament web site
as that way it could have an impact. A real campaign could have been mounted to get 100,000 votes and the possibility of a debate. In fact a petition to that effect has been
put on Parliament’s web site by others.
|Conference card demonstration against the destruction of Umm al-Hiran village in Naqab|
is probably the most vilified and loathed member of the 13 strong Joint List
that was elected last year. The Zionist parties,
including of course the Israeli Labour Party has done its best to prevent her
standing at all and it was only a Supreme Court decision that enabled her to
late last year enables the Jewish majority to expel an Arab member and in fact
they are in the process of doing just that.
Balad member Basel Ghattas
is at the moment under
threat of expulsion for having apparently smuggled in phones to Palestinians
serving long sentences in Israeli gaols.
When one of those he is alleged to have given a phone to is serving 37
years for having killed an Israeli soldier and Elor Azaria, the Kahanist
soldier who executed a comatose and wounded Palestinian is
not expected to serve any gaol time when he is sentenced in the near
future for manslaughter (not murder as he should have been charged), you understand the ingrained nature of Israeli racism and apartheid.
girl who won the regional contest of the Jack Petchie speaking context for her
wonderful speech ‘Birds not Bombs’ with reference to Gaza. When news of her victory emerged, vicious Zionist
trolls did what they normally do. They
racially abused her calling her ‘little Miss ISIS’. Disgracefully and as often happens in this
situation, the Jack Petchie Foundation backed down and removed her from the
contest and initially her performance from the
Web. I reported on this earlier
but Leanne was on fine form when she spoke to the Conference and I have no
doubt she will make a fine orator and addition to the Palestine solidarity
movement in the future.
|Me together with Haneen Zoabi!|
are on the offensive but the Left in the Labour Party as represented by Jeremy Corbyn is on the retreat when it comes to Palestine. Corbyn has disgracefully spoken
at two successive Labour Friends of Israel meetings at Labour Party conference
wholesale into the new IHRA definition of anti-Semitism which conflates anti-Semitism
regular fixture at PSC Conferences, at least sent greetings to Conference
delegates but it doesn’t make up for his backsliding all year and his retreat
in the face of the Zionist attacks. He
has supported the Jewish Labour Movement rule change to the Labour Party’s
constitution which would equate criticism of Zionism with anti-Semitism. The only conclusion that can be drawn from
this is either Corbyn’s long support for the Palestinians was skin deep or that
he doesn’t have the backbone or the political strength to withstand the Zionist
attacks. In fact if he had stood up to
their blackmail they would have backed off.
As it is Corbyn made a rod for his own back by repeatedly condemning anti-Semitism
but not realising that the ‘anti-Semitism’ that the Zionists talked of was
criticism of Israel not hatred of Jews.
long grass rebounded badly on him and Chakrabarti’s Report, which was a mixed
bag, was bad on Zionism, telling people that Labour had a ‘rich
tradition’ of support for Zionism and that people should be careful of even
using the term. If Chakrabarti had known
anything about Zionism then she would know it is in common usage amongst Zionists,
for example the JLM’s director, Ella Rose was captured by Al Jazeera saying ‘I’m,
a Zionist shoot me’. Likewise the
part of Chakrabarti’s Report that said ‘Zio’
was racist was a product of her ignorance, made even worse by Corbyn’s remark
that it was a ‘racial epithet’. ‘Zio’ is
short for Zionist which is a political not a racial epithet.
at Southampton University was prevented from going ahead, when Norwich and
Nottingham PSC’s had to move meetings because the original venues had been
cancelled as a result of Zionist pressure, when any church holding an event
involving Palestine can expect Zionist pressure, when even PSC’s own blog with
the New Statesman on the web was taken down as a result of Zionist pressure. Yet PSC Executive is incapable of mounting
any campaign on these, reducing the anti-Semitism offensive to ‘the
right to protest’ which it isn’t and believes the odd legal action is an
adequate substitute for an effective campaign.
up to oppose the Zionist offensive, has been paralysed by its own inability to
draw up an effective strategy aimed at tackling the JLM and Labour Friends of
Israel. It was almost completely absent
at the Conference making no intervention.
Instead despite my having parted company with it, I was left to tackle
the issue it was set up to campaign on whilst just one FSOI member, Glyn Secker, spoke and then only to say that FSOI didn’t need any help from PSC!