Why Israel is an Apartheid State – the Arguments That Weren’t Made
Saturday April 23, Palestine Solidarity Campaign placed an advert in the
Guardian. It must have cost about £10,000.
a time when there is an unprecedented attack on Palestine solidarity work in
this country, this statement was a wasted opportunity. The main theme, Palestine is being built out
of existence, was that it a Palestinian state is becoming more difficult to
achieve. Anyone with eyes and ears
should recognise that the 2 state solution is no longer achievable, assuming it
ever was. Zionism recorgnises the sovereignty of only one group of people, Jewish settlers.
the statement should have said and led on was a firm rebuttal of the media
frenzy in the past few months. A clear
and firm statement such as Anti-Zionism
is not anti-Semitism’ ‘Supporting Palestinian rights is not anti-Semitic’.
a reference could have been made to the fact that the most racist and indeed anti-Semitic elements
internationally, from the BNP to Marine Le Pen to Gert Wilders etc. etc. are
the strongest supporters of Zionism.
Brighton & Hove PSC leaflet
Instead of reproducing 3 statements from Israeli ministers affirming their refusal to allow a Palestinian state, PSC
could have done worse than take a leaf out of the leaflet from Brighton &
Hove PSC ‘meet the Israeli Government’ which reproduced statements
from various Israeli Government Ministers such as the Deputy Defence Minister,
Eli Dahan, who compared higher Jewish souls, including those of
homosexuals, to those of non-Jews.
It could have made the obvious point that since Israel refuses a separate Palestinian state then the refusal to grant Palestinians in the Occupied Territories the most basic of civil or political rights means Israel is an apartheid society.
could have referred to Israeli racism in terms of ‘death to the Arabs’ marches,
the banning of the Northern Islamic Movement even whilst the fascist Lehava
group, whose leader Benzi Gopstein justifies the burning down of mosques and
churches remains illegal.
advert could have made some more sophisticated arguments such as calling anti-Zionism
anti-Semitism is in itself anti-Semitic as it assumes all Jews are Zionists. It could even have pointed to the fact that
it was Jews who were historically the first opponents of Zionism. They could even have quoted someone like
Theodor Herzl on how the anti-Semitic countries would be the Zionists’ best
allies and friends.
could have pointed to the hypocrisy of people like Eric Pickles, Chair of the
Conservative Friends of Israel, who defend the Conservatives’ good friend
Michal Kaminski and an inveterate anti-Semite in the European Conservative and
the statement was bland an innocuous. So
bland that, I am told, even Jews for Justice for Palestinians refused to sign
Saturday an advert will appear in the Guardian reaffirming our right – indeed
our duty – to boycott Israel. The advert is based on the below statement:
judged by its actions, isn’t interested in peace. By erecting more and more
settlements on Palestinian land, it is in the process of building Palestine out
is not only our right to boycott those who aid and abet this occupation and,
now, colonisation of Palestine – it is our duty.
year it will be 50 years since the occupation of Jerusalem, the West Bank and
Gaza. 10 years since the siege of Gaza began, with 75,000 still displaced from
their homes since the Israeli bombardment of Gaza in 2014.
year, to 18th April, 63 people have been killed, 59 of these people
are Palestinians killed by Israeli forces. Over 1,600 Palestinians have been
UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights make it the duty of states
to uphold human rights. The British Government says principles of human rights
should apply the world over and calls on businesses, trade unions and civil
society to help them. Yet, they have continually failed to act over Israel’s
violation of Palestinian human rights.
in recent months the British Government and its Ministers have unleashed a
series of attacks on supporters of Palestine who advocate Boycott, Divestment
and Sanctions of Israeli institutions and companies complicit with breaches of
Palestinian human rights. These attacks have been accompanied by systematic
efforts to suppress legitimate criticism of Israel by branding it extremist,
divisive, and antisemitic.
rights are indivisible and global. It is not racist to criticise a state
because of its laws and actions, it is not racist to campaign for those laws
and actions to be changed.
is antisemitic to promote hatred or discrimination of Jewish people because of
their religion or ethnicity. As an anti-racist organisation, we abhor racism
directed at any group – we challenge it wherever it is found.
government’s attempt to promote fear and intimidation of legitimate protest and
to smear human rights defenders will only assist the real racists.
support the Palestinian-led call for a Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions
campaign which uses effective-yet-peaceful means to pressure Israel to end the
occupation and ensure Palestinians have the rights we take for granted. It is
civil society holding countries and companies accountable for their actions.
is the tool human rights defenders have used throughout history. It is a
non-violent, global and traditional form of protest used to oppose oppression.
It is not racist to refuse to buy, decline to invest in or stop supplying
goods, arms or services to companies and institutions that are knowingly
supporting breaches of human rights and international law.
than attack those defending human rights, the British Government should be
challenging Israel for its actions that breach international law.
to suppress the right to protest will not undermine the campaign for
Palestinian human rights – it will strengthen it.
proudly continue in the tradition of civil and human rights activists before
us. If it was good enough for Gandhi, Luther King Jr, and Mandela; boycott is
good enough for us.
is part of a growing global movement in support of Palestine, proudly refusing
to do business with Israel’s occupation, colonisation, and discrimination.