Scarlett Johanssen doesn’t sell
Sodastream must rue the day that they opened what was going to be their first shop in Brighton. It’s what’s called a loss leader. No one goes in to buy their toxic drinks and the Zionist counter-demonstrators have done a good job in keeping the public away!
|As usual an empty shop and a bored security guard|
Sodastream is paying a high price for establishing a factory in the West Bank settlement of Mishor Adumim.
Daniel Birnbaum, Sodastream’s CEO, has engaged in non-stop PR to try and reverse the Boycott Sodastream campaign. All he’s done is to dig a deeper hole into which his profits have flowed.
The big idea, buying Scarlett Johanssen, as a brand name has backfired. She has shown how Hollywood stars place career and money in front of their human rights work. In Johanssen’s case, it was just naked greed that was obvious to all.
|the empty shop that adds to Sodastream’s profit woes|
Below are just some of the stories about their financial worries in mainstream and financial journals:
Now their profits have slumped and financial investors see it as irreversible.
Special to The Globe and Mail
Published Tuesday, Feb. 04 2014
Shareholders in carbonated drink machine company SodaStream International Ltd. are looking for less controversy and more profit to prevent the stock from going flat.
|James – one of the fundamental Christians who wanted to hasten the Rapture|
SodaStream shares have fizzled out since the Israel-based company issued a profit warning last month that also coincided with a backlash for its decision to operate a factory in an Israeli settlement on the West Bank.
Reality and my take: The Soda story has lost its fizz and is unlikely to get it back.
— Written by Herb Greenberg in San Diego
“We expected some weakness in U.S. sales but are surprised by the magnitude of the company’s gross margin and earnings miss,” Jim Chartier, an analyst at Monness Crespi Hardt & Company, said in a report cited by Bloomberg News yesterday.
|A clear message Occupation is not Green|
He downgraded the stock to Neutral from Buy. “While we continue to believe in the story longer term, we are moving to the sidelines until we have greater clarity on the company’s gross margin issues,” Chartier said.
SodaStream’s NASDAQ shares plunged 25% yesterday after news of the profits warning. The stocks had dropped about 20% in the preceding three months.
SodaStream loses fizz as forecasts are cut
Rising production costs and a poor festive season have seen profits slump
The Guardian, Monday 13 January 2014
|a new Zionist who believes that the holocaust justifies Israeli racism|
Shares of SodaStream International Ltd were down 21% at $38.96, at midday on Monday, in New York.
|Palestinian supporter and a Fundie Christian behind him|
These are just some samples of the depth of the crisis facing Sodastream. Brighton, the place where the Boycott of Sodastream took off (or its opportunistically named ‘Ecostream’) had made the campaign a national priority for Palestine activists.
Below there are photos of the Brighton Sodastream demonstrations for the last couple of weeks.
A few Zionists, weirdos and thugs, coupled with a few Christian Fundamentalists, the most dedicated of the lot, who would like to see all Jews perish in the battle of Armageddon to hasten Jesus’ return, are doing a good job in putting the people of Brighton off. We gave in a petition of over 1,500 names to the local MP Caroline Lucas (who has been subject to some vile sexist abuse on leader Simon Cobb’s twitter a/c) – it was rapidly deleted but we got a screen print.
|Shaker Rozanski, a lunatic Israeli, with the smiling fool beside him|
When I come along, usually I can give only about ½ an hour because of health reasons, I get abuse of the ‘traitor’ ‘self-hater’ variety. As I’ve pointed out to these dim Zionists, it was the Nazis who accused German anti-fascists of being ‘traitors’ and ‘self-haters’ because they literally hated their nation and race. Once again Zionist bigots demonstrate that they have much in common with the Nazis,
|Scarlett adds her voice to the Boycott|
Cobbs called me a ‘kapos’ and self-hater a few weeks ago and when I responded he recorded the response only, since which time has made a complaint to the Police. However the Police don’t seem that interested as I did get a request to be interviewed but after my solicitor intervened it seems to have been postponed sine die.
Another Zionist who made a complaint against me is an Israeli nutcase, Shaker Rozanski, who picks on one theme (‘traitor’, Syria etc.) and repeats it ad nauseum. A few weeks ago I called him a Jewish Nazi and he complaint to no avail to the Police. Last week he made a move across the path that people walk on in order to attack me, so I was forced to punch with with a left hook. Shaker squealed and whined to the Police who have said they will no doubt want to talk to me about this too! However the law on self-defence is quite clear. If you perceive a threat of violence to you then you can act pre-emptively.
The Zionists fixate upon the Kapos, who the Nazis selected to carry out the supervision of other Jews. However they had no choice. Indeed it was the Kapos who initiated the rebellions at Auschwitz (where one of the crematoria was blown up), Treblinka, where many Jews escaped and Sobibor, where hundreds of Jews and others escaped.
It was the Jewish Councils, the Judenrat which provided the lists of who to round up and their accomplices in the Jewish police who were the real traitors and 66% of Jewish Council members were Zionists. The Zionists, who were favoured by the Nazi government in Germany prioritised building their ghetto state to saving Jews. Indeed they actively tried to prevent anyone else from rescuing Jews if the destination was not Palestine. One of Ben-Gurion’s most shocking statements concerned the attempts to rescue Jewish German children and send them to Britain. Fortunately the Zionist attempts to sabotage the kinder transports came to nothing:
|Scarlett Johanssen brings nothing but woe|
“If I knew that it was possible to save all the children in Germany by bringing them over to England, but only half of them by transporting them to Palestine, then I would opt for the second alternative. For we must weigh not only the life of these children–but also the history of People of Israel.” Lenni Brenner, p.149 ‘Zionism in the Age of the Dictators, citing Yoav Gelber, ‘Zionist policy and the fate of European Jewry 1939-42, Yad Vashem Studies, Vol. 12, p.199 and Tom Segev, p.28, the 7th Million. Ben-Gurion to the Mapai CC, 7.12.38, Labour Party Archives, Bet Berl Tsofit., 22/38, Shabtai Teveth The Burning Ground, p.855.
Zionism was a favoured movement amongst the Nazis (see Lucy Dawidowic, p.118, War Against the Jews). It is a movement of collaboration. As Jewish and non-Jewish people recognise what Zionism is and its abuse of anti-Semitism as a weapon against its opponents, so Israel is facing a never increasing Boycott.
|Jill Young – another mad Christian|
It is important though to remember that whether or not Sodastream moves its factory from the West Bank, which is a distinct possibility, it will still be an Israeli company that should be boycotted. The West Bank settlers have done nothing that the Zionists in Israel within the fictitious Green Line haven’t done before them. As Israel Galili, a founder of Ahdut Ha’avoda, former Minister of Information and Minister without Portfolio and a member of Golda Meir’s top Cabinet and a member of the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee and the Ministerial Committee for Settlement said:
“Our right in Gaza is exactly like our right in Tel Aviv. We are colonising Gaza exactly in the same manner in which we colonized Yafa. Those who doubt our right in Gaza should doubt our right in Tel Aviv as well.” Israel Galili, quoted in Haaretz, April 18, 1972 as reprinted in Israel: Utopia incorporated, Uri Davis, Zed Press, London, 1977, p. 15.
Even were it possible to separate Israel from the West Bank, then Israel would still be the oppressor of the Palestinians and a reactionary gendarme of imperialism. There can be no solution to the problem of Israel without de-Zionisation and the return of the Palestinian refugees.
Knesset ministers to consider whether to launch an aggressive public campaign or operate through diplomatic channels.
By Barak Ravid Feb. 9, 2014
|Benjamin Netanyahu, left, and Yuval Steinitz Photo by Daniel Bar-On|
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu convened a meeting Sunday evening to discuss how to cope with the growing threat of the economic boycott on Israel in light of continued occupation and settlement construction in the West Bank.
Senior Israeli officials said prior to the meeting that the plan was to try to decide on a strategy and determine whether to launch an aggressive public campaign or operate through quieter, diplomatic channels.
The discussion had been scheduled to take place last week, but cancelled at the last minute due to the political row between Netanyahu and Economy Minister Naftali Bennett. Sunday’s meeting will take place amid a different confrontation – this time between Bennett and Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman.
The previous discussion was supposed to include a broad forum of ministers. The Science Ministry asked to separate the discussion on the economic boycott threat from a discussion on the academic boycott threat, since there is already a strategy for the latter, while the former has yet to be dealt with.
The discussion, scheduled to begin at 5:30 P.M., will only include Lieberman, Bennett and Strategic Affairs Minister Yuval Steinitz, who is expected to present a plan his ministry has been working on.
According to plan, Israel should be proactive in its opposition to organizations who promote boycotts against Israel. The plan proposes to invest substantial resources in organising a public campaign.
Minister Steinitz is demanding a budget of 100 million shekels for implementation of the plan, which would include PR materials and aggressive legal and media campaigns against pro-boycott organizations.
The Foreign Ministry has a different approach. Diplomats think the non-governmental organizations pushing for a wide-ranging boycott against Israel and not strictly against the settlements are relatively marginal and that a public campaign against them will only play into their hands, bolstering them.
The Foreign Ministry thinks the public response to organizations promoting a boycott against Israel should be constricted. It wants to focus on less public diplomatic activity to combat such initiatives and believes advancing the peace process with the Palestinians will stave off a large portion of the boycott threats.
One of the issues to be discussed at the meeting is whether to file legal suits in European and North American courts against organizations that are proponents of the boycott divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement. Ministers will also consider whether to take legal action against financial institutions that boycott settlements, or boycott Israeli companies that are somehow operating in or connected to the settlements.
Another consideration is whether to activate the pro-Israel lobby in the U.S., specifically AIPAC, in order to promote legislation in Congress against the economic boycott of Israel, akin to the legislation that was passed in the 1970’s against the Arab boycott.
One of the issues that will be raised during the discussion is that there is a lack of knowledge and inefficient tracking by Israeli intelligence of pro-BDS organizations.
The Strategic Affairs Ministry has provided the Israel Defense Forces’ intelligence department a budget of several million shekels for the purpose of bolstering military surveillance of such organizations. However, the need for the prime minister to instruct the Shin Bet Security Service and the Mossad on the efforts is likely to come up.